Can anyone give me a rundown on Congruence?

  • Thread starter Thread starter AndersHermansson
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Congruence in mathematics refers to the relationship between two integers that leave the same remainder when divided by a fixed integer, known as the modulus. For example, two integers a and b are congruent modulo n, written as a ≡ b (mod n), if they yield the same remainder when divided by n. The modulus operator is essential in this concept, as it determines the equivalence classes of integers. Key properties of congruences include reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity, which help in simplifying calculations involving modular arithmetic. Understanding these principles allows for effective problem-solving in number theory and related fields.
AndersHermansson
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
I've googled for an hour now and I've found a few resources but they all assume you know the terminology. Like for example.

a = b(mod n)

Can anyone explain the modulus operator and congruence to me?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
0= 0 χ 5 + 0
1= 0 χ 5 + 1
2= 0 χ 5 + 2
3= 0 χ 5 + 3
4= 0 χ 5 + 4
5= 1 χ 5 + 0
6= 1 χ 5 + 1
.
.
.

We observe that the remainder left when any integer is divided by 5 is one of the five integers 0, 1, 2, 3, 4. We say that two integers a and b are "congruent modulo 5" if they leave the same remainder on division by 5. Thus 2, 7, 22, -3, -8, etc are all congurent modulo 5 since they leave the remainder 2. In general, we say that two integers a and b are congrent modulo d, where d is a fixed integer, if a and b leave the same remainder on division by d. For example, 15 and 1 are congruent modulo 7. We can write 15 ≡ 1 (mod 7)

Defination
Let a and b be integers and let n be a positive integer. We say a is congruent to b modulo n , written
a ≡ b (mod n)

In fact "a ≡ b (mod n)" and "a=b+nd (where d is an integer)" are equilvalent.


Here are more examples
2003 ≡ 3 (mod 1000)
1985 ≡ 85 (mod 100)
1985 ≡ 985 (mod 1000)
121 ≡ 0 (mod 11)
953 ≡ 4 (mod 13)

Here are some properties of congruences. For all integers a, b and c, we have
1) a ≡ a (mod n)
2) a ≡ b (mod n) if and only if b≡ a (mod n)
3) if a ≡ b (mod n) and b ≡ c (mod n), then a≡ c (mod n)
4) n | a if and only of a ≡ 0 (mod n)
5) If a ≡ b (mod n) and x is a natural number, then ax ≡ bx (mod n)
 
Thanks alot, that really helped!
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top