Can Artificial Gravitational Fields Create Wormholes for Space Travel?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter The_Absolute
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity Space-time
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores the hypothetical possibility of creating artificial gravitational fields to generate wormholes for space travel. Participants examine the theoretical underpinnings, energy requirements, and potential methods for achieving such phenomena, including the use of antimatter and cold fusion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that an extremely powerful gravitational force could hypothetically distort space-time enough to create a wormhole, akin to a black hole's gravitational field.
  • Another participant notes that while there are theoretical solutions to Einstein's equations resembling this idea, significant challenges exist, including the need for immense energy and exotic matter that may not exist.
  • Concerns are raised about the feasibility of controlling the required energy and matter, with one participant mentioning the potential collapse of a wormhole due to virtual particles.
  • Some participants propose that antimatter or cold fusion could provide the necessary energy, but others counter that these methods would still fall short of the required energy levels.
  • A participant provides a rough estimate of the energy needed, comparing it to the solar luminosity over the sun's lifetime and discussing the mass-energy conversion involved in matter-antimatter annihilation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views, with no consensus reached on the feasibility of creating wormholes or the adequacy of proposed energy sources. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the practicality of these concepts.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the speculative nature of the discussion, the dependence on theoretical physics, and the unresolved mathematical estimates regarding energy requirements.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those exploring theoretical physics, concepts of space-time, and advanced energy generation methods in the context of space travel.

The_Absolute
Messages
174
Reaction score
0
I've heard a lot about how an extremely powerful gravitational force can distort space and time. I was wondering (hypothetically) if it is possible to distort space-time enough by focusing a somehow artificial gravitational field into a single tiny point to pop a hole in space-time and travel vast distances through the cosmos in very little time. Sort of like an artificial wormhole. I am not a physicist, but I'm guessing that would require generating a gravitational field powerfully equal to that of a black hole. Which is probably impossible.

But if it were actually possible, human beings could travel to other galaxies, solar systems, in search for habitable, extra-solar planets to colonize, or perhaps search for extraterrestrial life.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are solutions to Einsteins equation that are a lot like what you describe, but don't expect to be able to buy wormhole generators at IKEA anytime soon. There are lots of problems: You'd probably need more energy than the sun radiates in its lifetime. You need to produce large amounts of a type of matter that may not even exist. You need to be able to control said matter precisely. And maybe a wormhole would collapse immediately due to virtual particles going around it in a loop infinitely many times.
 
Fredrik said:
There are solutions to Einsteins equation that are a lot like what you describe, but don't expect to be able to buy wormhole generators at IKEA anytime soon. There are lots of problems: You'd probably need more energy than the sun radiates in its lifetime. You need to produce large amounts of a type of matter that may not even exist. You need to be able to control said matter precisely. And maybe a wormhole would collapse immediately due to virtual particles going around it in a loop infinitely many times.

Perhaps that energy can be produced using anti-matter or cold fusion? When anti-matter collides with matter, they annihilate each other and create pure energy. However, I don't know if there is any way to control that reaction and use it as energy, and not create an explosion equal to that of 500 megatons of TNT.

Although that will probably still not produce anywhere near enough energy to create a wormhole.

Here, look at this. :P

2427438338_a6d762ee8e.jpg
 
Last edited:
The_Absolute said:
Perhaps that energy can be produced using anti-matter or cold fusion? When anti-matter collides with matter, they annihilate each other and create pure energy.
No. Both fusion and matter/anti-matter annihilation are insufficient to produce that kind of energy. There are some order of magnitude estimates in "The physics of Star Trek", by Lawrence Krauss. It's a good book, so you might want to check it out.
 
I don't know how much energy is required, but I'll take Fredrik's word for it that it's on the order of the solar luminosity emited over the lifetime of the sun.

To show you a rough estimate of the vast energy that is:

So, the sun fuses over 610 tons of hydrogen every second into about 606 tons of helium.

That's 4 tons of mass converted into pure energy every second. Using matter-antimatter annihilation you can do this using just 4 tons of material, instead of the 610 tons required by fusion. But still, 4 tons is quite a lot.

So, if the energy radiated over the lifetime of the Sun, that's about 10 billion years, is the energy you need, you need to convert over 1.2 quintillion tons of matter into pure energy using annihilation to get it. (For a rough idea of how much matter that is, it's about 3.4 trillion empire state buildings)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
8K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K