Poirot1
- 243
- 0
Let n =xy be a positive integer where x,y>2 are co-prime. Show that if a is co-prime to n, then $a^{\frac{\phi(n)}{2}}=1$ mod(n)
The discussion centers on the mathematical proof that if \( n = xy \) is a positive integer where \( x \) and \( y \) are co-prime integers greater than 2, and \( a \) is co-prime to \( n \), then \( a^{\frac{\phi(n)}{2}} \equiv 1 \mod(n) \). The proof utilizes Euler's theorem, which states that \( a^{\phi(n)} \equiv 1 \mod(n) \), and demonstrates that assuming \( a^{\frac{\phi(n)}{2}} \equiv -1 \mod(n) \) leads to a contradiction. The discussion emphasizes the necessity of applying the Chinese Remainder Theorem (CRT) for both \( x \) and \( y \) to fully satisfy the equivalence.
PREREQUISITESMathematicians, number theorists, and students studying modular arithmetic and co-prime properties, particularly those interested in proofs involving Euler's theorem and the Chinese Remainder Theorem.
Bacterius said:$$a^{\frac{\varphi{(n)}}{2}} \equiv b \pmod{n} ~ ~ ~ ~ \iff ~ ~ ~ ~ a^{\frac{\varphi{(n)}}{2}} \equiv b \pmod{x} ~ ~ ~ ~ \iff ~ ~ ~ ~ a^{\varphi{(x)} \frac{\varphi{(y)}}{2}} \equiv b \pmod{x} ~ ~ ~ ~ \implies ~ ~ ~ ~ b = 1$$
Explanations and justifications below:Step 1: Apply the CRT, since $n = xy$.
Step 2: Definition of the totient function, and $\gcd{(x, y)} = 1$.
Step 3: Recall $\varphi{(y)}$ is even as $y > 2$. Use Euler's Theorem as $\gcd{(a, x)} = 1$.
It occurs to me I've been using the parity property of $\varphi$ an inordinate number of times in the past week ;)
Poirot said:Your method is better than mine. But in step 1, wouldn't the CRT be applicable if n and x were co-prime? As it is, the -> direction is clear, but how do you get the <- drection in step 1?