Can Commandos Bypass a Force Field with an EM Emitter in Sci-Fi?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the feasibility of using an electromagnetic (EM) field as a force field in a science fiction narrative involving a military base. The original poster, a psychologist and aspiring sci-fi writer, questions whether commandos could use a mobile EM emitter to match the frequency of the base's EM field to pass through undetected. Responses clarify that while an EM field can block charged particles, it is unlikely to prevent neutral matter, like people, from passing through unless it is extremely strong. Suggestions for maintaining secrecy include creating a path that matches the field's boundary conditions or using alternative technologies, like gravito-photons or extra-dimensional weapons, to circumvent the force field. The conversation also touches on the balance between scientific accuracy and creative storytelling in science fiction, emphasizing that compelling narratives often prioritize character and plot over strict adherence to scientific principles. Ultimately, the thread reflects on the challenges and liberties taken in crafting believable yet imaginative sci-fi scenarios.
  • #31
drcathyc said:
Zoobyshoe: Any fiction writing must be good writing first, which means good story telling. But I think that good s.f. needs to keep its facts straight.
All you need to do is present whatever technology you please as a fait accompli and simply obviate any need to explain how it came to be. It will be successful if it fits in with the texture and ambiance of the whole. The average reader or movie goer isn't a physicist and won't even appreciate it if your technology is all a smooth extention of today's science. They already don't know how their computers, and microwaves and televisions work. They want good characters in good plot situations. If your story is bad, no one will care that you worked out a really plausible force field based on conventional EM fields.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
44
Views
11K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
8K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
10K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
5K