Can Electrons and Muons Revolutionize Alternative Energy Sources?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ~()
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electron Muon
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the potential use of electrons and muons in energy generation and transmission. Participants highlight the impracticality of using muons due to their short lifespan of approximately 2.2 microseconds and their heavier mass, which affects their movement in electric fields. The conversation emphasizes that inefficiencies in energy generation primarily stem from thermodynamic cycles rather than electrical transmission. The need for innovative energy transfer methods beyond traditional electronics is also proposed, particularly in light of increasing energy demands in advanced technologies.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electromagnetic force and its application in generators
  • Knowledge of particle physics, specifically the properties of electrons and muons
  • Familiarity with thermodynamic cycles and their efficiencies in energy conversion
  • Awareness of current advancements in superconducting materials and their implications
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of superconductivity and its potential applications in energy transmission
  • Explore optoelectronics and spintronics as alternative methods for energy transfer
  • Investigate advancements in thermodynamic cycles to improve energy conversion efficiencies
  • Examine current research on fusion energy and its theoretical efficiencies compared to traditional methods
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, energy engineers, researchers in alternative energy technologies, and anyone interested in the future of energy generation and transmission methods.

  • #31
~() said:
And they have zero relation to what I was initially discussing. I was not talking about LED's and insignificant electronics such as that - I was talking about high level energy transfer, and other forms of particles collisions apart from electricity. The key word in apart from electricity (electro-optics & opto-electronics are cleary to do with electricity). Notice how they have the words electro in them - relating to electricity.
The information you were discussing was besides the point - that is in no way optional forms of larger energy transfer (it is merely small signal and small energy transfer still using electronic systems).

I think I finally understand what you were trying to ask in the first place.

But you keep saying you do not want to use electricity, so you want to use a mechanical system to transfer all the energy generated? That of course would be inefficent because of friction issues. To repeat someone from earlier, I do not think we can control any other particles as easily as we can control electrons. Is it a matter of terminology and by not using electricity you mean not using electrons and if you used muons you would call it "muonicity" or something?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #32
Well I (and others) have pointed out that you cannot used muons simply due to their short half lifes (on the order of microseconds). However, I am not sure that I have seen much (if any) work done on other forms of energy transfer on this scale - everything is based around the idea of turning a generator to create electricity - and thus supply energy. Even if this is an unplausible idea, where will the advancements come for energy supplies in the future? Simply increasing the efficiency of electrical energy production?
 
  • #33
This thread has gone on long enough. Sorry I haven't been paying attention (and guys - you could always report it...)

~(), watch your attitude and your crackpottery. We tolerate neither here.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
555
Replies
0
Views
947