Can Fire Exist Without Being Hot?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Enjamiering
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fire Heat
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the nature of fire and whether it can exist without being hot to the touch. It is established that a flame is the result of rapid oxidation, typically producing heat and light. While underwater welding utilizes high-temperature torches like oxy-acetylene, flames generally emit heat, with the lowest flame temperatures around 200°C, which can still cause burns. Special effects in movies may create the illusion of flames without heat, but these techniques involve safety precautions and should not be attempted by amateurs.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of combustion processes and oxidation
  • Familiarity with flame characteristics and temperatures
  • Knowledge of welding techniques, specifically oxy-acetylene welding
  • Awareness of safety protocols in handling flames and special effects
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of combustion and flame chemistry
  • Learn about underwater welding techniques and their applications
  • Explore special effects techniques used in film to create safe flame illusions
  • Investigate chemiluminescence and its potential for low-temperature light emission
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for safety professionals, special effects artists, welding technicians, and anyone interested in the science of combustion and flame behavior.

Enjamiering
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Is it possible to have a flame that's not hot to the touch?

I'm not sure how fire/flames work but if they can burn underwater I don't see how they can't somehow be safe to the touch
 
Science news on Phys.org
A flame is light emitted when something is burning.
Generally that mean a substance is combining with atmospheric Oxygen and releasing energy as both heat and visible light.
There is a lot of free oxygen in the atmosphere but very little in water (None in pure water), so burning cannot take place.
 
One idea: if you consider that a flame is the rapid oxidation of the fuel, a slow oxidation process is rust forming on an iron bar. This is not too hot to touch.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: CWatters
rootone said:
There is a lot of free oxygen in the atmosphere but very little in water (None in pure water), so burning cannot take place.
High temperature torches (e.g. oxy-acetylene for welding) use their own supply of oxygen and are capable of operating both in the air and underwater. The fact that they are burning underwater does not magically make them cool to the touch -- they still melt metal.

Edit: A trip to Google suggests that wet underwater welding is normally arc welding rather than gas flame welding.
 
Generally, by definition a flame is a flame because it gives of light, which it does because it is hot.
 
Enjamiering said:
Is it possible to have a flame that's not hot to the touch?
Substances which combust with cooler flames are used in special effects in movies, where a person's clothing catches alight, etc. That's not gasoline burning on their coat as they run towards the lake, you know!

I think I've seen shows where the performer has a flame burning in his cupped hand, but extra special effects may be used here, to achieve this feat with impunity.

Nothing like this should be attempted by our readers. It is way too dangerous. (There was a news item last week about a copycat would-be firebreather rushed to A & E suffering burnt lungs when he mistakenly inhaled just before torching the airborne spray.)
 
A flame is the thin reaction zone we see when the combustion of fuel with an oxidizer occurs . Each fuel and oxidizer combination has a unique flame temperature associated with its combustion, which is the temperature associated with the net release of bond energy. I don't know of any combustible fuel-oxidizer combination that has a flame temperature low enough to not burn your skin. The lowest flame temperatures I know of are in the 200° C range. Still hot enough to hurt!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Enjamiering
The usual trick in shows is to not have the flame touch the person, or limit exposure time. Reactions between gases can happen at safe temperature but then you don't get visible flames.

I could imagine a chemical reaction that happens at low temperatures, but emits light directly from the reaction (instead of thermally induced emission in normal flames). No idea if you can get enough Chemiluminescence in a reaction of cold gases to make it visible. The two examples given there involve toxic substances.
 
I have just once seen marsh flame .

Very elusive and unstable areas of flickering blue flame very low to the ground .

Many explanations but commonly attributed to catalytic combustion of natural methane or bio-luminescence .

No explanation that I have seen has been entirely convincing .

Doesn't seem to have much heat output since flies and moths are untroubled by it when they fly over or through it .
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K