Can Infinity Minus X Ever Be Larger?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jumbogala
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Infinity
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of infinity in mathematics, specifically addressing the arithmetic operations involving infinity. It is established that infinity is not a number but a concept, leading to confusion when attempting to perform operations like infinity - X. The conversation highlights that in different mathematical systems, such as the extended real numbers and ordinal numbers, infinity can behave differently, but traditional arithmetic does not apply. Key insights include the clarification that infinity minus any finite number remains infinity, and the importance of understanding the context in which infinity is used.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic arithmetic operations
  • Familiarity with mathematical concepts of infinity
  • Knowledge of extended real numbers
  • Introduction to ordinal numbers and their properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of extended real numbers and their arithmetic
  • Explore the concept of ordinal numbers and their unique operations
  • Learn about projective real numbers and their implications in mathematics
  • Investigate the philosophical implications of infinity in mathematics
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of mathematics, and anyone interested in the philosophical and practical implications of infinity in mathematical theory.

jumbogala
Messages
414
Reaction score
4
I understand that infinity - X = infinity.

However, what I don't understand is this. If I have: infinity - 1 = infinity, AND infinity - 5 = infinity, is the first infinity larger than the second?

If so, how can that be? Because they are infinite, how can one really be larger than the other?

Also, you can't add to infinity, right? Or can you? *confused*

Thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I understand that infinity - X = infinity.
It does? When did we define infinity to be a number instead of a concept?

The problem with using infinity as a number is that you run into problems like this one. Infinity plus or minus can be anything you want it to be, but the point is that infinity is not a number. Infinity is simply a concept (for the most part). Using it as an actual number leads to results like these. It doesn't work.
 
Last edited:
Looking for a value of infinity minus X is like looking for a value of Apple divided by Cat. It's just not defined.
 
nicktacik said:
Looking for a value of infinity minus X is like looking for a value of Apple divided by Cat. It's just not defined.

Never had a cat with apple filling? You're missing out.
 
Infinity is what it's defined to be.

In the arithmetic of real numbers, there is no infinity. So statements like
infinity - X = infinity​
are gibberish.


It is possible to consider different systems of arithmetic. Two practical examples are the projective real numbers and the extended real numbers. In the extended real numbers, for example, it is true that
+\infty = +\infty - x
whenever x is not +\infty. The arithmetic of the extended real numbers is a different system; in particular, the statement
if x > 0, then x + y > y​
is simply not true.


Another useful number system is the ordinal numbers. There is no ordinal number called "infinity", but there are lots of infinite ordinals. The smallest infinite ordinal is \omega. In the ordinal numbers, the following statements are true:
1 + \omega = \omega
\omega + 1 > \omega
(note that addition is not commutative! If you add in different orders, you usually get different ordinal numbers)

The ordinals are related to orderings, and sequences. \omega is the ordinal that describes the sequence of natural numbers. 1 + \ometa is what you get by prepending an extra thing to the natural numbers... clearly the sequences
0 < 1 < 2 < ...
* < 0 < 1 < ...​
have the same order type. The ordinal number \omega + 1 is what you get if you append an extra thing to the natural numbers:
0 < 1 < 2 < ... | *​
Every natural number appears in this sequence before the *, and there is no number that comes immediately before *. This sequence is clearly different than the other two above.

(The | is my own notation for this sort of thing. It's like a parenthesis: it's meant to indicate that the stuff on the left is to be taken as one "group", and the stuff on the right is to be taken as another "group")


I suppose the simple answer is, if you intend to learn about the infinite, you should forget everything you "learned" about it from nonmathematical sources.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
13K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K