Can Injectivity of a Matrix Guarantee a Left Inverse?

  • Thread starter Thread starter y_lindsay
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion confirms that if a matrix A with dimensions n x s has a rank of s, then there exists a matrix X such that XA = I, where I is the identity matrix of dimensions s x s. This conclusion is derived from the injectivity of the linear map T represented by matrix A. The solution for X can be expressed using singular value decomposition (SVD) as X = VΣ^(-1)U^T, where Σ^(-1) contains the reciprocals of the singular values of A. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the left inverse or pseudo-inverse, specifically the Moore-Penrose inverse, in this context.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear algebra concepts, particularly matrix rank and injectivity.
  • Familiarity with singular value decomposition (SVD) and its applications.
  • Knowledge of linear maps and their representation through matrices.
  • Basic understanding of identity matrices and their properties.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties and applications of the Moore-Penrose inverse in linear algebra.
  • Study the implications of matrix rank on the existence of inverses in linear transformations.
  • Explore advanced topics in singular value decomposition and its computational techniques.
  • Learn about the relationship between injective linear maps and their corresponding matrix representations.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for mathematicians, data scientists, and engineers who work with linear algebra, particularly those involved in solving systems of equations and optimizing matrix operations.

y_lindsay
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
We have X\in R^{s\times n}, A\in R^{n\times s}, I\in R^{s\times s}, where I stands for the indentity matrix.
Now if we assume that rank(A)=s, can we conclude that there must exist a solution X to matrix equation XA=I?

For me the answer is obviously "yes" if we think this problem in the language of linear map instead of matrices.

Let T be the linear map whose matrix is A with respect to the standard basis. Then the above question is converted into if T is injective, can we always find an S maping R^{n} to R^{s}, such that ST is an identity operator in R^{s}?

The linear map S is defined as follows:
for any x\in range(T), Sx is the unique vector y\in R^{s} such that Ty=x. this is ensured because T is injective.
for other x\in R^{n}, Sx=0.

Though knowing for sure how S behaves, is there any way to write out the matrix of S with respect to the standard basis?
i.e. what does the solution X to matrix equation XA=I look like?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Use singular value decomposition,

A=U\Sigma V^T \Longrightarrow X = V\hat{\Sigma}U^T

where \hat{\Sigma} has the reciprocals of the original on the diagonal. Note that there is a technical peculiarity but I guess you can figure it out. Search for left inverse (or pseudo-inverseor Moore-Penrose inverse). It is almost fun .
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
2K