Can Integrals Ever Blow Up and What Does That Mean?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter eep
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integrals
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of integrals that "blow up," particularly focusing on improper integrals and the challenges of integrating functions with singularities, such as 1/x and 1/|x|, over certain ranges. Participants explore various approaches to handling these integrals and the implications of singularities on their evaluation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants discuss the concept of improper integrals and the necessity to split integrals at singularities, such as in the case of 1/x.
  • There is a suggestion that 1/x cannot be integrated over any range that includes 0, as it leads to undefined behavior.
  • One participant proposes integrating 1/|x| by splitting the integral into two parts and taking limits, but expresses frustration over the inability to evaluate it properly.
  • Another participant suggests a substitution method for integrating 1/|x| but questions the validity of the result, suspecting an oversight in handling the singularity at 0.
  • A later reply emphasizes the importance of not ignoring singularities and provides a method to evaluate the integral by taking limits as the bounds approach the singularity.
  • Some participants introduce the concept of principal value integrals from complex variable theory, noting that the integral of 1/x can be defined in this context and may yield different results.
  • There is mention of symmetry in integrals, specifically that the Cauchy principal value of the integral from -1 to 1 of 1/x is zero.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the evaluation of integrals involving singularities. While some agree on the necessity of splitting the integral and taking limits, others propose alternative methods, such as principal value integrals, leading to multiple competing perspectives without a clear consensus.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on definitions of integrals and the handling of singularities, which remain unresolved in the discussion. The mathematical steps involved in evaluating these integrals are also not fully agreed upon.

eep
Messages
225
Reaction score
0
Integrals that "blow up"

Hi, I'm trying to figure out if there's any way I can integrate a function over a range which includes a value that the integral "blows up" at, for example 1/x integrated from -1 to 1.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes; it's called an improper integral. In this case, you split your integral into two pieces, so that the singularity is at the boundary. Then, you replace the bound with a variable, and take the limit as the bound goes to zero.

(In this particular case, the result is that the integral does not exist)
 
so 1/x cannot be integrated over any range that passes through 0?
 
Not even a range that just touches zero!

But for fun, try integrating [itex]1/\sqrt{x}[/itex].
 
What about the intergral of 1/|x|? (absolute value of 1/x)

I don't have a problem with [itex]\frac{1}{\sqrt{x}}[/itex] because [itex]x^\frac{1}{2}[/itex] is defined everywhere (even though you might get imaginary numbers)
 
Last edited:
Oh, my bad, I meant [itex]1 / \sqrt{ |x| }[/itex]. :blushing:

You can most easily answer your question by working it out. You already know the answer for the integral of 1/x, right? And what is the definition of |x|?
 
Well, what I want to try and do for 1/|x| from say -1 to 1 is to change the integral into the integral of -1/x from -1 to 0 + the integral of 1/x from 0 to 1 but this doesn't work either. I tried replaced the 0's with h's and taking the limit but you still end up with the same problem. Grr. Can it just not be evaluated at all? |x| is just the absolute value of x. It gets rid of any sign information.
 
A thought... suppose we are trying to do the integral of 1/|x| from -1 to 1. We make the substitution u^2 = x, therefore...

[tex] 2udu = dx[/tex]

[tex] \int_{-1}^{1} \frac{1}{|x|} dx = \int_{\sqrt{-1}}^{\sqrt{1}} \frac{2u}{|u^2|} du<br /> <br /> = \int_{\sqrt{-1}}^{\sqrt{1}} \frac{2}{u}<br /> <br /> = 2 (\ln{|1|} - \ln{|1|})<br /> <br /> = 0<br /> [/tex]
I can't immediately see what's wrong with this but I'm sure this can't be right as there is obviously only positive area under the graph of 1/|x|.
 
eep said:
A thought... suppose we are trying to do the integral of 1/|x| from -1 to 1. We make the substitution u^2 = x, therefore...

[tex] 2udu = dx[/tex]

[tex] \int_{-1}^{1} \frac{1}{|x|} dx = \int_{\sqrt{-1}}^{\sqrt{1}} \frac{2u}{|u^2|} du<br /> <br /> = \int_{\sqrt{-1}}^{\sqrt{1}} \frac{2}{u}<br /> <br /> = 2 (\ln{|1|} - \ln{|1|})<br /> <br /> = 0<br /> [/tex]
I can't immediately see what's wrong with this but I'm sure this can't be right as there is obviously only positive area under the graph of 1/|x|.
In your first post, you asked how to do an integral like this and, in his first response, Hurkyl told you how. Perhaps, "what's wrong with this" is that you are simply ignoring what he said! In general, if there is a singularity in the middle of an interval, you cannot just ignore it and evaluate the anti-derivative at the two endpoints.

Since 1/|x| is not defined at 0, integrate from -1 to some negative [itex]\alpha[/itex], integrate from some positive [itex]\beta[/itex] and add. Then take the limit, if it exists, as [itex]\alpha[/itex] and [itex]\beta[/itex] go to 0. That is:
[tex]\int_{-1}^\alpha \frac{dx}{|x|}+ \int_\beta^1 \frac{dx}{|x|}[/tex]
Since |x|= -x for x< 0 and |x|= x for x> 0, this is just
[tex]-\int_{-1}^\alpha \frac{dx}{x}+ \int_\beta^1 \frac{dx}{x}[/tex]
[tex]= -ln|x|\left|_{-1}^\alpha+ ln|x|left|_\beta^1[/tex]
[tex]= -ln|\alpha|+ ln|-1|+ ln|\beta|- ln|1|= ln|\beta|- ln|\alpha|[/tex]
Finally, take the limit as [itex]\alpha[/itex] and [itex]\beta[/itex] go to 0 independently. In this case, that limit does not exist so the integral does not exist..
 
  • #10
When you use complex variable theory, the integral of 1/x or 1/z can be defined in terms of what's called a principal part integral or principal-value integral. And then the integral of 1/x from -R to R can be shown to be zero -- it is, after all, an odd function.

This approach goes back to the turn of the 20th century when much research was being done on solutions of the wave equations in terms of Green's functions. You'll find discussions in most texts on advanced E&M, or on complex variable theory and, so-called Hilbert Transforms. Byron and
Fuller's Mathematics of Classical and Quantum Physics (Dover) gives a detailed discussion

Regards,
Reilly Atkinson
 
  • #11
By symmetry the integral [tex]\int_{-1}^{1}dx/x[/tex] is 0 taking Cauchy,s principal value for integral.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K