Can Light Ever Travel Faster Than the Speed of C?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter idiosyncratic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the question of whether light can ever travel faster than the speed of light in a vacuum, denoted as C. Participants explore various aspects of this concept, including definitions, implications of speed in different mediums, and related thought experiments.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that light cannot exceed the speed of C, emphasizing that this is a fundamental aspect of physics.
  • One participant suggests that light can be accelerated through different mediums, which affects its effective speed but not its intrinsic speed in a vacuum.
  • A thought experiment is presented regarding two objects traveling at the speed of light in opposite directions, raising questions about their relative speeds.
  • Another participant expresses confusion about a physics demonstration related to the constancy of light speed and time dilation, seeking further clarification.
  • Several humorous contributions highlight the use of "C" in various contexts, such as capacitance and carbon, rather than the speed of light.
  • A participant mentions that understanding the principles of Special Relativity is key to grasping why nothing can exceed the speed of light.
  • One participant notes that light is absorbed and emitted by transparent materials, which can create delays in its travel time, but maintains that light always travels at speed C when in a vacuum.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that light cannot exceed the speed of C, but there are varying interpretations and nuances regarding how light behaves in different contexts and mediums. The discussion includes both serious inquiries and light-hearted exchanges, indicating a mix of understanding and confusion among participants.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about specific physics concepts, such as the implications of light speed in different mediums and the relationship between speed and time dilation, indicating that further clarification may be needed.

idiosyncratic
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hi! Its me again. I randomly sat up in bed today, after having a nice dream filled with nice things, and my first thought is this questions:

Is there any instance where light can go faster then C?
and/or
Is it possible to accelerate light past C?

My attempt at a solution: Since the technical definition of C is the constant speed of light, it probably can't. But I still wonder. You can probably tell I'm not a physics major, because these questions will probably be easily answered.
 
Science news on Phys.org
no light can't go faster than c. and neither can anything else to our knowledge. I think the only way to accelerate light is to put it through different mediums. but in empty space like a vacuum, light's speed is c.

And I apologize in advance for my physicsness not allowing me to let this slide. c is lowercase:P
 
C is capacitance. and something else I am sure.
 
sorry about putting c as an uppercase. :-) It just seems like such an important number that it should be an uppercase. I do that with other words too. If something seems important, I automatically put it as an uppercase without thinking about it. Thanks for responding!
 
haha no worries. Its not like I didn't know what you were talking about.

Another concept for you to think about:

imagine you have something traveling at the speed of light in one direction. and something else traveling at the speed of light in the opposite direction. what is the difference in their speeds? its still the speed of light. that one always messed with me.
 
dacruick said:
imagine you have something traveling at the speed of light in one direction. and something else traveling at the speed of light in the opposite direction. what is the difference in their speeds? its still the speed of light. that one always messed with me.

That's one concept that's been screwing me up for the last day. :-) It was in a physics lecture my family and I watched yesterday. Today I think we're going to return to that conundrum and further explore the implications of it.
 
oh man, sounds like you have a pretty cool family. do you mind posting on this thread tomorrow letting me know what you learned?
 
idiosyncratic said:
Is there any instance where light can go faster than C?

Yes, light is always faster than Carbon. :-p
 
lmao see, another capital c. so we have capacitance and carbon so far. any others?
 
  • #10
uart said:
Yes, light is always faster than Carbon. :-p
:biggrin: yeah, I meant c, not C. oops.

dacruick said:
oh man, sounds like you have a pretty cool family. do you mind posting on this thread tomorrow letting me know what you learned?

Sure, I'll post back once we watch it. :-) My Dad's pretty into physics, so he kind of wrangled us into it. Surprisingly I started enjoying it, which is probably why I end up asking stupid questions. lol. Ahh well, even stupid questions are better then no questions.
 
  • #11
dacruick said:
lmao see, another capital c. so we have capacitance and carbon so far. any others?

the Roman numeral for 100... the first note in a C major scale... can't think of anything else. lol
 
  • #12
dacruick said:
oh man, sounds like you have a pretty cool family. do you mind posting on this thread tomorrow letting me know what you learned?

Usually I understand the physics lesson, but I was confused this time. :-) I didn't understand the guys demo. They were supposedly talking about how light is measured at c no matter how you are moving relative to it, but I think he switched topics pretty quickly, to the time slowing down when you move faster relative to something. Maybe its the same topic? It seemed like he got so caught up in his illustration, that he neglected to explain it thoroughly. Know of any good books that might explain this to me better?
 
  • #13
dacruick said:
lmao see, another capital c. so we have capacitance and carbon so far. any others?

Celsius, Centigrade?
 
  • #14
dacruick said:
lmao see, another capital c. so we have capacitance and carbon so far. any others?

Coulombs. 'C' is also a measure of dilutions in homeopathic solutions and a unit of paper sizes:

http://www.unc.edu/~rowlett/units/dictC.html
 
  • #15
"Circuit", when used in IC (integrated circuit) or PCB (printed circuit board).
 
  • #16
dacruick said:
lmao see, another capital c. so we have capacitance and carbon so far. any others?

adrianna-head-for-the-mountains.jpg


...if I'm not mistaken?
 
  • #17
well if you really want to understand why,
you can find your answer in Special Relativity.
It's pretty simple,
and it shows that no matter how, nothing can exceed the speed of light,c.
or else the physics law will be violated.
 
  • #18
dacruick said:
I think the only way to accelerate light is to put it through different mediums.

In fact light always travel at c. If I'm not mistaken light get absorbed by transparent materials and then emitted, absorbed, emitted and so on so that it takes longer for light to reach a distance light in vacuum would do in a lesser time. But photons or whatever light is, always travel to c.
Any physicist correct me please. I'm just a physics student. :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
667