Can Luminosity Give You a Star's Age?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter chefskitten
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Age Luminosity
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between a star's luminosity and its age, specifically addressing two yellow stars of equal mass but differing luminosities. It is established that while a star's luminosity increases with age, this change is minimal until the star exits the main sequence. The mass-luminosity relationship is critical, as a more massive star will have a different spectrum and temperature, making luminosity alone an unreliable metric for age estimation. The consensus is that luminosity differences are insufficient for accurately determining a star's age.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the mass-luminosity relationship in stars
  • Knowledge of stellar evolution and the main sequence phase
  • Familiarity with stellar spectroscopy and temperature analysis
  • Basic concepts of stellar age estimation techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mass-luminosity relationship in detail
  • Learn about stellar evolution phases beyond the main sequence
  • Explore techniques for analyzing stellar spectra
  • Investigate methods for estimating stellar ages using multiple parameters
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysics students, and anyone interested in stellar evolution and age estimation techniques will benefit from this discussion.

chefskitten
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
You find two yellow stars at the same distance (but not in a binary system!). They have the same mass, but one is much more luminous than the other.
Which one is older?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stellar_age_estimation:
"As stars grow older, their luminosity increases at an appreciable rate"

So I would assume the more luminous one.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks for your input howabout1337! That's what I was thinking, just wanted some confirmation
 
I don't get it. How would you tell an old modest-sized star from a large younger star, both of which have the same luminosity?
 
The luminosity of a star is strongly dependent on mass, which is known as the mass-luminosity relationship. While the luminosity of a star does increase somewhat with age, the difference is small until it leaves the main sequence. It would be a wildly unreliable way to determine the age of a star.
 
phinds said:
I don't get it. How would you tell an old modest-sized star from a large younger star, both of which have the same luminosity?

The more massive one has a different spectrum. It will be hotter, even if their luminosity is the same.
 
Chronos said:
The luminosity of a star is strongly dependent on mass, which is known as the mass-luminosity relationship. While the luminosity of a star does increase somewhat with age, the difference is small until it leaves the main sequence. It would be a wildly unreliable way to determine the age of a star.

Do you know if this graph is accurate? This seems to be a pretty big change.
From here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun#Main_sequence

544px-Solar_evolution_%28English%29.svg.png
 
It's at least approximately right. When I studied these things, the sun went off the main sequence a little sooner and more quickly (9.1 BY), but there's a factor of ~2 or so luminosity increase over the course of the main sequence.
 
When the sun first entered the main sequence, it was about 70% of its current luminosity. Over the next 4.5 billion years, it's luminosity is expected to increase by about 67%. I do not consider that enough of a luminosity difference to be useful to estimate the age of a star.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
491
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K