Can Magnets in Equilibrium Defy Energy Conservation Laws?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the behavior of three circular magnets in equilibrium, specifically addressing the conservation of energy when one magnet is moved closer to another. The central magnet remains fixed at the origin, while the other two magnets repel each other from a distance. When the third magnet is moved closer and released, it returns to its original position due to the repulsive forces, despite the potential energy stored during the movement. This raises questions about the conservation of energy, as the system appears to lose energy to friction yet behaves contrary to expectations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of magnetic forces and repulsion
  • Basic principles of potential energy
  • Knowledge of equilibrium in physical systems
  • Familiarity with energy conservation laws
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of magnetic repulsion and its effects on equilibrium systems
  • Study potential energy storage and conversion in magnetic fields
  • Examine the role of friction in energy loss during magnet interactions
  • Explore advanced concepts in thermodynamics related to energy conservation
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, engineering students, and anyone interested in the principles of magnetism and energy conservation in physical systems.

paras02
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
If three circular or ring type magnets are placed such tnat centeral magnet is having its center at origin and other two are placed at its aperture repeling each other but they are just at enough distance such that the whole system is in equillibrium, placed on surface having friction.
If i fix any of the two magnets i.e a centeral one and anyone of the above and try to move the third one closer to the second fixed magnet and , leave it, it gets back to its orignal position.
The energy i spent in bringing them together is stored as potential energy and some part of that energy is lost in form of heat so at that particular point when the third one is close to the second one the system was just having the potential energy stored in it which is to be spent against friction also so the third magnet must not return to its orignal position but it is returning to its orignal position due to repulsion .
So please explain the the conservation of energy in this case.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The analysis is flawed.
When you let go, the magnet does not return to it's equilibrium position - even in the absence of friction.

Where did you get this from?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
11K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K