Can Mirrors Create a Window to See into the Past?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter baker27marine
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Future
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the theoretical possibility of using mirrors to create a "window" to see into the past, specifically exploring the implications of light travel time and reflection. Participants examine the concept from both a theoretical and observational perspective, considering different setups and definitions of seeing into the past.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes that if two mirrors are placed far apart, light could reflect off one and reach the other after a minute, theoretically allowing one to see a minute into the past.
  • Another participant suggests that looking at stars provides an easier way to see into the past, as the light from those stars takes thousands of years to reach Earth.
  • A different viewpoint questions the necessity of two mirrors, proposing that a single mirror placed 30 light-seconds away could also allow one to see their reflection from a minute earlier, provided a powerful telescope is used.
  • Some participants emphasize the definition of simultaneity in the context of observing stars, noting that this allows for viewing them as they were in the past, but express that there is no independent proof for the mirror scenario compared to the star observation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the feasibility and methodology of using mirrors to see into the past. While some agree on the concept of light travel time, there is no consensus on the practicality of the proposed setups or the definitions used in the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the assumptions about perfect environments for mirror setups, the dependence on definitions of simultaneity, and the unresolved nature of the proposed methods for observing the past.

baker27marine
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Let's say theoretically we can setup a perfect environment with two mirrors at a great distance apart. The distance is great enough to allow light to reflect off one mirror and not reach the other mirror until a full minute has elapsed. Could this in "theory" create a window to see one minute into the past?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sure, but using this definition it's much easier to see into the past. Just look up at the stars and you're seeing them as they were thousands upon thousands of years ago.
 
baker27marine said:
Let's say theoretically we can setup a perfect environment with two mirrors at a great distance apart. The distance is great enough to allow light to reflect off one mirror and not reach the other mirror until a full minute has elapsed. Could this in "theory" create a window to see one minute into the past?
Why do you need two mirrors? You could put just one mirror at a distance of 30 light-seconds away and then watch yourself as you were one minute earlier. You'd need one powerful telescope to resolve anything though. But you could easily prove that it worked by comparing the image of your clock in the mirror to what it says when you look at it directly.
 
Vorde said:
Sure, but using this definition it's much easier to see into the past. Just look up at the stars and you're seeing them as they were thousands upon thousands of years ago.
Yes, using the definition of simultaneity that the stars we see in the sky are as they were thousands of years ago, we can look up in the sky and see them as they were thousands of years ago. There is no independent proof like there is in my previous post.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 127 ·
5
Replies
127
Views
9K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K