Can Moving a Hydrogen Atom by an Angstrom Alter Its Mass?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between the movement of a hydrogen atom in a gravitational field and its mass. It questions whether moving an atom by an angstrom or a Planck length would result in a measurable increase in its mass due to potential energy changes. Participants debate whether this change affects inertial mass or only gravitational mass, with some arguing that mass remains constant regardless of position in a gravitational field. The conversation also touches on the quantization of gravity, suggesting that potential energy is a theoretical construct rather than a measurable entity. Ultimately, the consensus leans towards the idea that neither type of mass changes with small positional adjustments in a gravitational field.
YummyFur
Messages
97
Reaction score
0
Not sure if this should be in the quantum or classical forum, but as gravity has not been shown to be quantised yet...

My question is this, seeing as there is no quantised theory of gravity yet, that would mean that if a single atom of say hydrogen residing on the surface of the Earth was moved radially away from the centre of the Earth by a single angstrom unit, then it must be theoretically possible to calculate the increase in it's mass due to it's increased potential energy. Is this correct? If so how small is this number, in approximate orders of magnitude.

If it is correct then the same must be true if instead of an angstrom unit it is moved by a mere Planck length.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why do you think the potential energy of small particle in a gravitational field would change its inertial mass? I think it will not.
 
Are you suggesting that only it's gravitational mass that is increased? I just thought that potential energy manifested as mass increase, but maybe not for a subatomic particles maybe just for a system like a spring?

But the main point I wish to understand is how it can be that there is any question that gravity is quantised. I mean how can it not be, if potential energy as a result of gravity is reliant on a measurement, and this measurement must necessarily be limited by the Planck length then gravity must be quantised, must it not?
 
I think that neither inertial nor gravitational mass of the particle changes when it changes its position in gravitational field. In electrostatic field, particle has the same mass wherever it may be. It is the total mass of the whole system (source of the field) + particle that changes when the particle moves.

Do you really think that potential energy is something that gets measured? I think it is just a theoretical concept, mathematically defined to be integral of motion of equations of motion.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top