Can Nonradiative Decay occur for a single atom?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Higgy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atom Decay
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the possibility of nonradiative decay occurring for a single atom, particularly focusing on the mechanisms by which an excited state might transition to a lower-energy state without emitting a photon. The scope includes theoretical considerations and mechanisms relevant to atomic and molecular physics.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that nonradiative decay refers to transitions that do not result in the emission of a photon, specifically clarifying that it should not be confused with electron emission.
  • There is a consensus that free atoms are unlikely to decay without emitting a photon, while molecules can undergo nonradiative transitions through vibrational or rotational modes.
  • One participant mentions that radiationless transitions have been observed in small molecules like benzene, suggesting that nonradiative processes exist in certain contexts.
  • Another participant introduces the concept of dynamic quenching mechanisms, such as Förster resonance energy transfer and Dexter electron transfer, as potential nonradiative pathways for energy transfer from excited states to interacting molecules.
  • However, it is noted that if the atom is considered free and non-interacting, spontaneous emission of radiation is viewed as the only available decay mechanism.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that nonradiative decay is unlikely for a free atom, with the discussion highlighting multiple competing views regarding the applicability of dynamic quenching mechanisms and the definition of a "free atom."

Contextual Notes

The discussion hinges on the definitions of "free atom" and "nonradiative decay," which may depend on specific conditions or interactions not fully explored in the thread.

Higgy
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
As I understand it, "nonradiative decay" of a system from an excited state to a lower-energy state is any type of decay that does not result in the emission of an electron.

I can't think of any way that a free atom could decay without emitting a photon. Molecules, yes, (through vibration/rotation), but atoms - no. Is that true?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Higgy said:
As I understand it, "nonradiative decay" of a system from an excited state to a lower-energy state is any type of decay that does not result in the emission of an electron.
You certainly mean photon, not electron.
Higgy said:
I can't think of any way that a free atom could decay without emitting a photon. Molecules, yes, (through vibration/rotation), but atoms - no. Is that true?

Yes, although radiationless transitions are already observed in quite small molecules like e.g. Benzene.
 
DrDu said:
You certainly mean photon, not electron.

Sorry, yes - photon. (What a strange, plasma-filled world we'd live in otherwise!)

Yes, although radiationless transitions are already observed in quite small molecules like e.g. Benzene.

Great, thank you.
 
What about dynamic quenching mechanisms, for example Förster resonance energy transfer or Dexter electron transfer, that transfer the energy of the excited state to an interacting molecule? Could these mechanisms provide a nonradiative pathway for an excited state atom to decay to the ground state?
 
Ygggdrasil said:
What about dynamic quenching mechanisms, for example Förster resonance energy transfer or Dexter electron transfer, that transfer the energy of the excited state to an interacting molecule? Could these mechanisms provide a nonradiative pathway for an excited state atom to decay to the ground state?

Yes, but the OP specified a free atom, which I took to mean that a non-interacting atom. In that case, spontaneous emission of radiation is the only available decay mechanism.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K