Changing Earth's position by 10000 km in 100 years can be achieved with a close fly-by of an asteroid with a mass of
2*1015 tonnes, which is an object with a diameter of ~100 km.
Chiron at ~200 km is large enough and in a somewhat unstable orbit, but we would have to move it by something like 100 million km to make a close pass at a planet (which would then send it towards Earth). If we assign another 100 years for that maneuver we need 10
20 kg m/s initial momentum change. That's two orders of magnitude lower than the momentum change Earth will get. As Chiron is larger than the asteroid in the first calculation it will shift Earth's position faster - something like 10 years might be enough.
10 MT TNT equivalent is enough energy to accelerate 8*10
10 kg to 1 km/s, providing ~10
14 kg m/s momentum change under ideal conditions. We only need a million of these weapons.
We can do better if we bombard Chiron with smaller asteroids. Plan 100 impacts of 2*10
11 tonne asteroids, that's probably more than needed. Moving each asteroid by a billion kilometers over 100 years would only need ~100 bombs each, or 10,000 total. Better: Start with bigger impacts, then use smaller impacts to fine-tune the orbit of Chiron. Even course corrections could need thousands of bombs so we don't want to get that wrong.
tl;dr: It's not completely impossible to move Earth's location in space by 10000 km over something like 100 years with near-future technology, but it would be a project far larger than everything we have ever done.
Chiron making such a close pass would be an amazing sight. We'll need to remove it - or its fragments - from that orbit afterwards (more asteroids impacts?), otherwise it will impact Earth at some point and end all life here.