Black holes' existence from our point of view

In summary: Just because we can't see it happening doesn't mean it isn't happening. In summary, while we may not be able to observe matter falling into a black hole, it still has a gravitational effect on its surroundings and can be inferred from its influence on nearby objects. This discrepancy between what we can see and what we can infer is due to time dilation and the fact that light and gravity propagate at the same speed.
  • #1
Gerinski
323
15
Hi, layman here,

I have often read that because of time dilation, we would never see any infalling matter actually crossing the event horizon, it would just look more and more redshifted towards becoming invisible, even for infrared or microwave / radio detectors, but never becoming part of the black hole itself, it would seem to stay "frozen" just at the event horizon.

However, I believe it is safe to say that black holes do exist and exert gravitational influence on spacetime and matter around them. Sagitarius A* seems to be a clear example, based on the observed orbits of nearby stars which can only be explained by the presence of the black hole.

So as a layman, I would naively interpret that there seems to be a difference between what we can optically see and what we can gravitationally infer, even if both light and gravity are supposed to propagate at the same speed.

Let's say we have a black hole which 1 million years ago had a mass of 1 million solar masses, and let's take that as our "starting point". We could see it at that time and measure its mass from its gravitational effects.

Since then, matter surrounding it has been pulled in and falling into the black hole, let's say 500,000 solar masses more increasing the black hole's mass to 1.5 million solar masses.

Now, assuming we were able to observe since 1 million years ago, we would not be able to see that those 500,000 solar masses fell into the black hole. From our point of view, they would look just like highly redshifted stuff, approaching the black hole but never actually getting to cross the event horizon and falling into it in order to increase its mass. From our point of view the black hole's mass would still be 1 million solar masses, because the extra 500,000 have not reached it from our point of view, they stay hovering above the event horizon, dramatically redshifted.

But, I guess, the gravitational effects we would observe from the black hole right now would be according to a black hole of 1.5 million solar masses. Right?

If so, how do we reconcile the facts? We see a black hole of only 1 million solar masses exerting a gravitational influence of 1.5 million solar masses (the other 500,000 solar masses do exert gravity but are observed as still hovering above the horizon).

Does this make any sense? Or is it just that the gravitational influence of the 500,000 solar masses, even if we can never see them as becoming part of the black hole, must be computed in order to get the total gravitational influence of the black hole?

TX !
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #2
Gerinski said:
Hi, layman here,

I have often read that because of time dilation, we would never see any infalling matter actually crossing the event horizon, it would just look more and more redshifted towards becoming invisible, even for infrared or microwave / radio detectors, but never becoming part of the black hole itself, it would seem to stay "frozen" just at the event horizon.
Yes, in terms of what we can observe that is correct.

However, I believe it is safe to say that black holes do exist and exert gravitational influence on spacetime and matter around them. Sagitarius A* seems to be a clear example, based on the observed orbits of nearby stars which can only be explained by the presence of the black hole.
Correct.

So as a layman, I would naively interpret that there seems to be a difference between what we can optically see and what we can gravitationally infer, even if both light and gravity are supposed to propagate at the same speed.
Correct.

Let's say we have a black hole which 1 million years ago had a mass of 1 million solar masses, and let's take that as our "starting point". We could see it at that time and measure its mass from its gravitational effects.

Since then, matter surrounding it has been pulled in and falling into the black hole, let's say 500,000 solar masses more increasing the black hole's mass to 1.5 million solar masses.

Now, assuming we were able to observe since 1 million years ago, we would not be able to see that those 500,000 solar masses fell into the black hole. From our point of view, they would look just like highly redshifted stuff, approaching the black hole but never actually getting to cross the event horizon and falling into it in order to increase its mass. From our point of view the black hole's mass would still be 1 million solar masses, because the extra 500,000 have not reached it from our point of view, they stay hovering above the event horizon, dramatically redshifted.

But, I guess, the gravitational effects we would observe from the black hole right now would be according to a black hole of 1.5 million solar masses. Right?
Of course. The fact that we can't observe what we know to be happening is irrelevant to its actually happening.
If so, how do we reconcile the facts? We see a black hole of only 1 million solar masses exerting a gravitational influence of 1.5 million solar masses (the other 500,000 solar masses do exert gravity but are observed as still hovering above the horizon).
There is nothing to reconcile. If you are outside the BH, all of the mass that you know to have fallen in is closer to the center of mass than you are and therefore has exactly the same gravitational effect on you as if it actually WERE hovering at the EH.

Does this make any sense? Or is it just that the gravitational influence of the 500,000 solar masses, even if we can never see them as becoming part of the black hole, must be computed in order to get the total gravitational influence of the black hole?
As I said above, the mass is all there and the effects are all there.
 

What is a black hole?

A black hole is a region in space where the gravitational pull is so strong that nothing, including light, can escape from it. It is formed by the collapse of a massive star.

How are black holes detected?

Black holes are detected through their effects on the objects around them. This can include the way they distort light, the way they affect the orbits of nearby stars, and the way they emit X-rays.

Can we see a black hole?

No, we cannot see a black hole directly as light cannot escape from it. However, we can see the effects of a black hole on its surrounding environment.

How do black holes affect time?

Black holes have a strong gravitational pull, which can cause time to slow down for objects near the black hole. The closer you get to a black hole, the slower time will appear to pass.

Will a black hole eventually swallow the entire universe?

No, a black hole's gravitational pull only affects objects within its immediate surroundings. The universe is constantly expanding, and there are many factors at play that will prevent a black hole from consuming everything.

Similar threads

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
0
Views
243
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
2
Views
942
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
4
Views
965
Replies
4
Views
432
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
5
Views
1K
Back
Top