Can Partial Derivative Rules Fail Under Certain Conditions?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter gulsen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Partial Philosophy
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the fundamentals of partial derivatives, specifically questioning the validity of certain derivative relationships under various conditions. Participants explore the implications of the chain rule for partial derivatives and the differences between total and partial derivatives. The scope includes theoretical considerations and mathematical reasoning.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • The original poster questions whether the relationships \(\frac{\partial f}{\partial x} = \frac{\partial f}{\partial g}\frac{\partial g}{\partial x}\) and \(\frac{d f}{d x} = \frac{\partial f}{\partial g}\frac{\partial g}{\partial x}\) can be true in general, expressing confusion over the conditions under which they might fail.
  • Some participants suggest looking into the chain rule for partial derivatives, implying that it may clarify the original poster's questions.
  • One participant emphasizes the importance of analyzing the function composition and differentiating between total and partial derivatives, indicating that these distinctions are crucial for applying the rules correctly.
  • Another participant provides an example function \(F(x,y)=x^3+y^3\) to illustrate how to compute partial derivatives, although this may not address the original poster's deeper concerns about the relationships between derivatives.
  • A later reply reiterates the original poster's confusion and stresses that understanding the dependencies of variables is essential before proving any derivative relationships.
  • One participant argues that the expression \(\frac{d f}{d x} = \frac{\partial f}{\partial g}\frac{\partial g}{\partial x}\) does not make sense under the assumption that \(f\) depends on \(g\) and other variables, suggesting that this relationship requires careful consideration of variable dependencies.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the validity of the proposed derivative relationships, with some suggesting that the chain rule may apply while others argue that certain expressions do not hold under specific conditions. The discussion remains unresolved, with no consensus reached on the validity of the original poster's claims.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the lack of clarity on the dependencies of the variables involved and the specific conditions under which the derivative relationships are being evaluated. Participants acknowledge that these factors are crucial for any proof or argument regarding the validity of the claims.

gulsen
Messages
215
Reaction score
0
partial derivate "philosophy"

I'm having problems with fundementals of partial derivatives. I've looked around for something like "partial derivative FAQ", but couldn't find.

Can any of the following be true in general?

[tex]\frac{\partial f}{\partial x} = \frac{\partial f}{\partial g}\frac{\partial g}{\partial x}[/tex]
[tex]\frac{d f}{d x} = \frac{\partial f}{\partial g}\frac{\partial g}{\partial x}[/tex]

I'd rather expect
[tex]\frac{d f}{d x} = \frac{d f}{d g}\frac{d g}{d x}[/tex]
but the partial version seems to be working equally. Can there be cases where the partial version fails?

Also, it's weird that although
[tex]\frac{d f}{d g} = \frac{1}{\frac{d g}{d f}}[/tex]
holds for all,
[tex]\frac{\partial f}{\partial g} = \frac{1}{\frac{\partial g}{\partial f}}[/tex]
doesn't. Why not?

I'm desperately looking for a proof for any of them...

p.s.: You may ask which one is independent variable and on what f and g depends. I leave it to the guy who's willing to prove them, because I'm not sure whether if makes any difference in a general proof.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You might want to look up the chain rule(s) for partial derivatives because I think I remember covering a few of these cases in my Calc 3 class.
 
Step 1: analyse the function and see if it's a composition of functions; Step 2: remember that a total differential of a function and a partial derivation are not the same; Step 3: apply rules.
 
suppose you have a function
F(x,y)=x^3+y^3
if we want partial derivative of Fx
we write
fx(x, y)= 3x^2
if we want partial derivative of Fy
we write
fy(x,y)= 3y^2
 
sgd4182 said:
suppose you have a function
F(x,y)=x^3+y^3
if we want partial derivative of Fx
we write
fx(x, y)= 3x^2
if we want partial derivative of Fy
we write
fy(x,y)= 3y^2

I think that the original poster already knew this, and it's not a matter of "writing" it's a matter opf taking the derivative with respect to a single variable in a function of several variables.
 
gulsen said:
I'm having problems with fundementals of partial derivatives. I've looked around for something like "partial derivative FAQ", but couldn't find.

Can any of the following be true in general?

[tex]\frac{\partial f}{\partial x} = \frac{\partial f}{\partial g}\frac{\partial g}{\partial x}[/tex]
[tex]\frac{d f}{d x} = \frac{\partial f}{\partial g}\frac{\partial g}{\partial x}[/tex]

I'd rather expect
[tex]\frac{d f}{d x} = \frac{d f}{d g}\frac{d g}{d x}[/tex]
but the partial version seems to be working equally. Can there be cases where the partial version fails?

Also, it's weird that although
[tex]\frac{d f}{d g} = \frac{1}{\frac{d g}{d f}}[/tex]
holds for all,
[tex]\frac{\partial f}{\partial g} = \frac{1}{\frac{\partial g}{\partial f}}[/tex]
doesn't. Why not?

I'm desperately looking for a proof for any of them...

p.s.: You may ask which one is independent variable and on what f and g depends. I leave it to the guy who's willing to prove them, because I'm not sure whether if makes any difference in a general proof.
You can't prove anything until you know what it is you are trying to prove. And that depends on just the things you are not telling us!

When you write
[tex]\frac{\partial f}{\partial x} = \frac{\partial f}{\partial g}\frac{\partial g}{\partial x}[/tex]
the fact that you are using partial fractions implies that f is a function of several variables, one of which is g and we don't know what the others are, that g is itself a function of several variables, one of which is x. We could assume that the other variables f depends on do not themselves depend on x- so those partial derivatives are 0. If g and those other unknown variables depend on other variables, say y and z, then what you have makes sense: f can be written as a function of x, y, z, say and we are calculating the derivative of f with respect to x only.

On the other hand
[tex]\frac{d f}{d x} = \frac{\partial f}{\partial g}\frac{\partial g}{\partial x}[/tex]
I don't think can make sense. If f depends on g, whether there are other variables or not, and g depends on x as well as other variables, implied by the [itex]\frac{\partial g}{\partial x}[/itex] then f must depend on those other variables as well and df/dx makes no sense.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K