Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the question of whether humans can breathe through their mouths during sleep, particularly in the context of a case involving a man who suffocated after using tampons to block his nostrils. The conversation touches on medical implications, anecdotal evidence, and differing perspectives on the ability to breathe through the mouth while sleeping.
Discussion Character
- Debate/contested
- Exploratory
- Technical explanation
Main Points Raised
- Some participants reference the case of Mark Gleeson, questioning how the coroner's statement about the tampons relates to the ability to breathe through the mouth during sleep.
- Others argue that not everyone can breathe through their mouth while sleeping due to various medical issues, suggesting that some individuals may have difficulty with this.
- One participant emphasizes the importance of considering additional factors, such as alcohol consumption and sleeping pills, which may have contributed to the incident.
- A later reply claims that the story of Mark Gleeson has been fabricated and asserts that humans can breathe through their mouths if nasal breathing is obstructed, citing a lack of documented cases of suffocation due to a blocked nose in medical literature.
- Another participant notes the strength of the reflex to breathe, indicating that it is difficult to suppress, and advises against experimenting with breathing techniques.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express differing views on the ability to breathe through the mouth during sleep, with some asserting that it is possible while others highlight medical limitations. The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing perspectives present.
Contextual Notes
Some claims rely on anecdotal evidence and personal interpretations of the case, while others reference scientific literature. The discussion does not reach a consensus on the implications of the case or the physiological aspects of mouth breathing during sleep.