Can photon be at rest or does it have to travel at the speed of light?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around whether a photon can be at rest or if it must always travel at the speed of light (c). It touches on concepts from both classical electromagnetic theory and quantum mechanics, exploring the implications of masslessness and the nature of light and photons.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that light is defined to travel at c in any inertial reference frame, implying that photons cannot be at rest.
  • One participant distinguishes between the speed of light in a vacuum and the concept of a photon, suggesting that the group velocity of electromagnetic waves does not directly relate to the speed of a photon.
  • Another participant emphasizes that the term "photon" is often misunderstood, arguing that photons should not be viewed as particles in the classical sense, and that they do not possess a position or velocity until they interact with matter.
  • A participant states that massless particles must travel at c, reinforcing the idea that a stationary massless particle is not possible in any reference frame.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that photons cannot be at rest and must travel at the speed of light. However, there is disagreement regarding the interpretation of photons and their relationship to light, with some participants emphasizing the distinction between classical and quantum descriptions.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes nuances regarding the definitions of light and photons, the implications of masslessness, and the differences between classical electromagnetic theory and quantum mechanics. These aspects remain unresolved and are subject to interpretation.

!Jon Snow!
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
Can you explain please!


thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Light is defined to travel at c in any Inertial Reference Frame (IRF). Therefore it cannot be at rest. Unlike other particles that travel at less than c or that are at rest in one IRF, when you use the Lorentz Transformation process to see what the speeds of those particles are in another IRF traveling at any speed short of c with respect to the first IRF, photons continue to travel at c while slower particles can end up traveling at other speeds including going in the other direction or stopping altogether. You can't stop a photon except by ending its existence.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
I was thinking of saying something like this, but I was concerned that we might get photons and "light" mixed up. When we say the speed of light in a vacuum is c, we're saying the group velocity of the EM wave in vacuum is c. This is not trivially related to the speed of a photon.
 
!Jon Snow! said:
I was thinking of saying something like this, but I was concerned that we might get photons and "light" mixed up. When we say the speed of light in a vacuum is c, we're saying the group velocity of the EM wave in vacuum is c. This is not trivially related to the speed of a photon.

"Photon" is one of the more misunderstood words floating around...

It sounds as if you're thinking that a photon is a "particle of light" and that a beam of light consists of a stream of photons flowing by, rather like the way that water coming out of a firehose is a stream of water molecules flowing by. That picture is hopelessly misleading, as a photon is not a particle in the sense that a bullet or a grain of sand would be.

Because relativity is not a quantum mechanical theory, it has no photons and light is electromagnetic waves as described by the classical electromagnetic theory of Maxwell. Photons only come into the picture when you consider the quantum mechanical behavior in which a light wave, no matter how spread out in space it is, delivers energy to a single points when it interacts with matter. Thus, when someone says "this is where the photon is", they are being careless with the English language; it would be more accurate to say "right here is where the light wave delivered a packet of energy". The photon doesn't even have a position, let alone a velocity, except at the moment that it is interacting with matter.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Massless particles must travel at c. A 'stationary' massless particle is not an option in any reference frame.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 93 ·
4
Replies
93
Views
6K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
971
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
569