Can Poles of Integer Order be Eliminated in the Redefinition of Integrals?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter eljose
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the possibility of redefining integrals that diverge due to the presence of poles of integer order in the integrand. Participants explore methods to assign finite values to such integrals, considering the treatment of poles and the use of residues.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests redefining the integral by considering the residues of the poles, proposing an expression that includes the integral plus the sum of residues.
  • Another participant agrees that if there are a finite number of poles, one can integrate around the poles and conclude that the integral over the original area equals the sum of the residues.
  • A different viewpoint highlights that divergence can also arise from the behavior of the function at infinity, not solely from the poles, and questions the applicability of residues to functions that are not complex analytic.
  • One participant inquires about methods to avoid singularities in the integrand altogether.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the conditions under which residues can be applied and the reasons for divergence, indicating that multiple competing perspectives remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations regarding the assumptions made about the nature of the function F(x), particularly concerning its behavior at infinity and the types of singularities present.

eljose
Messages
484
Reaction score
0
Let,s suppose we have the integral:

[tex]\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dxF(x)[/tex]

but unfortunately we have a problem..the function F(x) has several poles of integer order r (r=1,2,3,4...) so it diverges :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: then my question is if there is a form to redefine our integral so it can be assigned a finite value by "eliminating" somehow its poles considering them as residues so finally we have an integral:

[tex]\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dxF(x)+ Res(F)[/tex] where the integral is

finite and Res(F) would be the sum of the residues of F(x) at its poles...or something similar..pehaps with the "Cauchy principal value integral"?...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Of course you can (assuming a finite number of poles): place small circles around the poles and integrate over the remaining area. Of course, if your function has only poles as singularities, then its integral on this new domain is 0 so the integral on the original area is just the sum of the residues. But we knew that already, didn't we?
 
but unfortunately we have a problem..the function F(x) has several poles of integer order r (r=1,2,3,4...) so it diverges
That's not the only reason a function may diverge. F(x) also fails to converge to zero as x goes to infinity. And even if it did go to zero, it might not do it fast enough.

Speaking about residues, AFAIK, only make sense if you're talking about complex analytic functions.
 
But..is there a way to "avoid" the singularities of the integrand?..
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K