Can Rock, Paper, Scissors Be Reinvented with New Rules?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DaveC426913
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Paper Rock
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a reimagined version of the game Rock, Paper, Scissors, where participants propose objects that "beat" the previous object in a creative and humorous manner. The scope includes playful interactions and imaginative reasoning, with specific rules set to guide the responses.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests starting a new game with boundaries, emphasizing that responses must follow a specific format and cannot include certain disallowed elements.
  • Another participant introduces thermite as an object that can burn through a computer and other materials, challenging others to beat it.
  • Several participants engage in playful banter about the rules, with some questioning the validity of previous responses and others attempting to clarify the game's mechanics.
  • Multiple objects are proposed as responses, including sulfuric acid, lye, and various animals, each claiming to defeat the previous object in a humorous manner.
  • Participants express confusion over the implications of time travel and the paradoxes that arise from the game's rules, particularly regarding the sequence of actions.
  • Some participants suggest restarting the game from specific points due to perceived violations of the established rules.
  • There are instances of off-topic comments and humorous exchanges that contribute to the playful nature of the discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally do not reach consensus on the validity of certain responses and the interpretation of the rules, leading to multiple competing views and ongoing debate.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include unresolved paradoxes regarding the sequence of actions and the implications of the rules, particularly concerning time travel and the definition of "beating" an object.

  • #121
Bucket of offal unhots blonde.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #122
arildno said:
Bucket of offal unhots blonde.
Hannibal Lecter serves bucket of offal with a nice Chianti.
 
  • #123
Tapeworm gives Hannibal Lecter digestion problems.
 
  • #124
arildno said:
Tapeworm gives Hannibal Lecter digestion problems.
Anthelmintic tablet flabbergasts tapeworm. (I'll let others play now... :smile:)
 
  • #125
Allegeric reaction with Anthelmintic tablet beats Anthelmintic tablet
 
  • #126
HIV-virus removes immune system, and hence, allergic reactions.
 
  • #127
condome use (ne need to explain :D )
 
  • #128
Over-eager teeth puncture condom
 
  • #129
arildno said:
HIV-virus removes immune system, and hence, allergic reactions.
Cure to the HIV-virus beats HIV-virus
Edit: too late...
 
Last edited:
  • #130
scott1 said:
Cure to the HIV-virus beats HIV-virus
I don't believe you are allowed to creat something that doesn't exist!
 
  • #131
Too late response beats scott1
 
  • #132
editing post beats too late of response
 
  • #133
arildno said:
Over-eager teeth puncture condom
Flying puck beats teeth.

Hockey!
 
  • #134
Puckered hole encloses puck.
 
  • #135
Soda beats puckerd hole
 
  • #136
Soda?
I must protest..
 
  • #137
scott1 said:
Soda beats puckerd hole
Baking soda? :confused:
 
  • #138
BobG said:
Baking soda? :confused:
If it works yes...
 
Last edited:
  • #139
NO!
Either unpucker my hole or pre-occupy it with something else before the puck arrives!..
 
  • #140
Ok the teeth is replaced with industricble robotic teeth that can connect to the internet,there also cellphone and take pictures beats pucker hole...I think:confused:
 
  • #141
Cellphone is acceptable.
Telemarketer beats cellphone.
 
  • #142
Natinoal do not call list beats Telemarketer
 
Last edited:
  • #143
Political organization doesn't have to obey do-not-call list.
 
  • #144
Revolution destroys established political organization.
 
Last edited:
  • #145
New constitution destroys the need for a revolution.
 
  • #146
Manchot said:
New constitution destroys the need for a revolution.
New constitution insprires new revolution in which all elected officials are summarily executed.
 
  • #147
Ferrets consume new authoritarian regime.
 
  • #148
Mass extiction beats ferrets
 
  • #149
I think that is a hammer.

Luck of some organisms beats mass extinction.
 
Last edited:
  • #150
Humans wipe out remaining ferrets (or whatevers left) in the never ending quest for food.
 

Similar threads

PF Fan Fiction: Mathematicians in Love
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Moral Observation Sentences: Can Ethics be Modeled on Science?
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
7K