Can Scalar Fields Be Decomposed Similar to Vector Fields?

Click For Summary
Scalar fields can be decomposed into a divergence field and another scalar field, as demonstrated by the equation φ = ∇·A + ρ, where φ is the scalar field, A is a vector field, and ρ is another scalar. This decomposition allows for infinitely many representations based on the choice of vector field A. However, if ρ is chosen randomly, the corresponding vector field A that satisfies the equation ∇·A = φ - ρ is not uniquely defined, as divergence alone does not determine the vector field without additional information. The discussion highlights the flexibility and limitations of scalar field decomposition in relation to vector fields. Overall, scalar fields can be decomposed, but uniqueness depends on the conditions applied.
bsaucer
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
If a vector field can be decomposed into a curl field and a gradient field, is there a similar decomposition for scalar fields, say into a divergence field plus some other scalar field?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, perhaps you are not stating your question in a very precise manner to help us understand what exactly you mean, but I believe scalar field decomposition is easy. Suppose we have scalar field ##\phi## and ##\vec{A}## is any vector field, then we can write the equation

$$\phi=\nabla\cdot \vec{A}+\rho$$ where ##\rho## is another scalar field. Since in this equation both ##\phi## and ##\nabla\cdot\vec{A}## are scalar their difference ##\rho=\phi-\nabla\cdot \vec{A}## is well defined and is a scalar too. So in this way a scalar field can be decomposed in infinitely many ways, each way for each random vector field A we choose.

On the other hand if we first chose the scalar field ##\rho## randomly and then we seek for a vector field ##\vec{A}## that satisfies the equation

$$\nabla\cdot\vec{A}=\phi-\rho$$ then this vector field A is not uniquely defined since knowing only the divergence of a vector field does not uniquely determine the field (we also must know its curl and know some other conditions as well to uniquely determine it).
 
For simple comparison, I think the same thought process can be followed as a block slides down a hill, - for block down hill, simple starting PE of mgh to final max KE 0.5mv^2 - comparing PE1 to max KE2 would result in finding the work friction did through the process. efficiency is just 100*KE2/PE1. If a mousetrap car travels along a flat surface, a starting PE of 0.5 k th^2 can be measured and maximum velocity of the car can also be measured. If energy efficiency is defined by...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
590
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K