Can SO(3) be used for Poincare spacetime symmetry in the standard model?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the role of the SO(3) group in relation to Poincare spacetime symmetry within the context of the Standard Model of particle physics. Participants explore the relationship between various symmetry groups, including SO(3), SU(2), and U(1), and their applications in theoretical frameworks, particularly in Lagrangian formulations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Conceptual clarification, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about the application of SO(3) in the Standard Model, questioning its role in the Lagrangian and its relation to Poincare symmetry.
  • Another participant explains that SO(3) is part of the Poincare group, which includes Lorentz transformations and translations, and distinguishes it from the gauge groups SU(3), SU(2), and U(1) that describe internal symmetries.
  • A later reply suggests that while groups like SO(3), SU(2), and U(1) relate to spin representations, they do not inherently define linear translations in space, proposing that these groups can be extended to comply with Galilean, Lorentz, or Poincare groups.
  • This reply also posits that the term "space" may refer to various mathematical spaces, such as Hilbert space, rather than just physical space, and discusses the implications for charge models.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between SO(3) and spacetime symmetries, with some suggesting that SO(3) does not directly address linear translations, while others affirm its inclusion in the broader context of the Poincare group. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the precise role and implications of these symmetry groups.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the definitions and applications of the groups may depend on specific contexts, such as whether they are applied to physical space or abstract mathematical spaces. There is also a suggestion that the understanding of these groups may require further clarification regarding their compliance with broader symmetry groups.

lkwarren01
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
I'm a layman trying to understand the symmetries used in the std model. I understand that
U(1), SU(2), & SU(3) are incorporated in the Lagrangians for internal symmetries. I've read that SO(3) is also used in the std model for Poincare spacetime symmetry. Is that true and if so, how is it applied...is it somehow in the Lagrangian too?
Thanks very much
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The SO(3) is the group of spatial rotations and as such part of the space-time symmetry, which is the Poincare group, consisting of the Lorentz transformations [which contain the rotations and "boosts" (i.e., switching from one inertial frame to another one, which moves with constant velocity with respect to the former)] and space-time translations.

The SU(3)xSU(2)xU(1) describes the gauge group of the standard model of elementary particles. These are transformations not in space-time coordinates but in abstract spaces, describing charge-like quantities. E.g., the SU(3) consists of all complex 3 x 3-matrices which operate in "color-charge space" of the strong interactions. Each quarks comes in three copies (labeled as "red", "green", "blue") and each antiquark in three "anti-copies" ("anti-red", "anti-green", "anti-blue"). These matrices have determinant 1 and leave the scalar product in the three-dimensional color-vector space invariant. It is generated by 8 independent infinitesimal generators, and accordingly the gauge potential consists of an octet representation of this color SU(3) also known as "the adjoint representation".
 
thanks very much for you help
 
Hmmm, I'm thinking it's really necessary to get some clarity on this. Would you agree that the groups, SO(3), SU(2), U(1) for example, specify the representational logic of spin but not linear translation in space?

The term space above is not necessarily mundane physical "space" but may be Hilbert space for instance or potentially any mathematical space which allows the same rules as rotation groups. The rotation groups implicitly assume that the object being represented in terms of spatial extension is centered at the origin in the group's coordinate system. Or rather that the axial point of spin is the origin.

The groups above do not specify compliance with the Galilean, Lorentz or Poincare groups however rules or operations on the rotation groups can easily be constructed that are in compliance with groups such as the Galilean, Lorentz or Poincare groups. Those groups add the dimension of time as well as linear translation rules. Doing so gives at least a partial definition of how "space" behaves apart from rotation characteristics and leads to specific applications such as the behaviors within particular charge models.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
9K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
9K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K