rocomath
- 1,752
- 1
correct and yes b/c it tells you what role they're playing, but you're able to recognize them so it's all good.yoshi6 said:okay is this one right?
2Ag + 2e- -> 2Ag0
isnt the cathode reaction: Ag+ + e- -> Ag
and the anode reaction: Ag-> Ag+ + e-
Is that significant at all?
anyways
so we have
Ag^+ (aq) + e^- \rightarrow Ag (s) \ E^0 = +0.80
Ni^{2+} (aq) + 2e^- \rightarrow Ni (s) \ E^0 = -0.28
which becomes
2Ag^+ (aq) + 2e^- \rightarrow 2Ag (s) \ E^0 = +0.80
DO NOT! multiply your charge by 2, Electrical potential is an intensive property just like density.
Ni^{2+} (aq) + 2e^- \rightarrow Ni (s) \ E^0 = -0.28
choosing Nickel to be our anode, we flip it's half-reaction
2Ag^+ (aq) + 2e^- \rightarrow Ag (s) \ E^0 = +0.80
Ni (s) \rightarrow Ni^{2+} (aq) + 2e^- \ E^0 = -0.28
notice how i didn't flip it's charge? there are two methods in dealing with whether you change your sign or not.
if you're using the equation E_{cell}=E_{cathode}-E_{anode} keep your charges the same, if you're just going to add it all up without the equation, flip your charge with respects to the half-reaction you have chosen to be your anode.
so how would you write your overall reaction? (just add them up and cancel the electrons) and what is the EMF?
Last edited:
; I have been planning to do it since last two months.