Can someone explain this complex math problem?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving an impedance matching problem using the formula Z = (XC*RL)/(XC+RL), where XC is the capacitive reactance and RL is the load resistance. The term 315 is derived from the calculation (333*1000)/(sqrt(333^2+1000^2)), which simplifies to approximately 316. The angle of -71.58 degrees is obtained using the arctangent function, atan(1000/-333), confirming the polar representation of the impedance as 315, -71.58 degrees. The method of eliminating complex numbers from the denominator is also discussed, emphasizing the use of the conjugate.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex numbers and their representation in polar coordinates
  • Familiarity with impedance matching concepts in electrical engineering
  • Knowledge of capacitive reactance (XC) and load resistance (RL)
  • Proficiency in using trigonometric functions, specifically arctangent
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of polar coordinates from rectangular coordinates in complex numbers
  • Learn about impedance matching techniques in RF circuit design
  • Explore the use of conjugates in simplifying complex fractions
  • Investigate the applications of capacitive reactance in various electrical circuits
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, students studying circuit design, and anyone involved in RF engineering or impedance matching will benefit from this discussion.

Voltux
Messages
29
Reaction score
3
I'm working out an impedance matching problem from a textbook (it is not part of any coursework) and I am trying to figure out how they get the 315 term in the polar coordinates below.

Z = (XC*RL)/(XC+RL)

= (-j333*(1000))/(-j333+1000)
= 315 , -71.58*
= 100 -j300 ohms

I calculated that atan(1000/-333) = 71.58* however I do not understand where they got the 315 from. I get 249 or 499 depending on positive or negative.

I understand that 315 would be the length of the ray, and -71.58 would be the angle as this is capacitive hence -j. e.g. converting from rectangular to polar if I understand correctly.

It was explained as (333*1000)/(sqrt(333^2+1000^2)) and that indeed does give us 315.943 ~316, however, I do not understand how they used the mathematical function to get to this point and I was hoping someone could explain what I'm missing.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Voltux said:
I'm working out an impedance matching problem from a textbook (it is not part of any coursework) and I am trying to figure out how they get the 315 term in the polar coordinates below.

Z = (XC*RL)/(XC+RL)

= (-j333*(1000))/(-j333+1000)
= 315 , -71.58*
= 100 -j300 ohms

I calculated that atan(1000/-333) = 71.58* however I do not understand where they got the 315 from. I get 249 or 499 depending on positive or negative.

I understand that 315 would be the length of the ray, and -71.58 would be the angle as this is capacitive hence -j. e.g. converting from rectangular to polar if I understand correctly.

It was explained as (333*1000)/(sqrt(333^2+1000^2)) and that indeed does give us 315.943 ~316, however, I do not understand how they used the mathematical function to get to this point and I was hoping someone could explain what I'm missing.
Getting rid of a complex number in the denominator of a fraction is done by multiplying the fraction by 1 in the form of the conjugate of the denominator over itself.

$$\frac {a + jb}{c + jd} = \frac {a + jb}{c + jd} \cdot \frac{c - jd}{c - jd} \\
= \frac{(a + jb)(c - jd)}{c^2 + d^2} = \frac{ac + bd }{c^2 + d^2} + \frac{j(bc - ad)}{c^2 + d^2}$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Voltux

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
4K