Can Someone explain Why we integrate over 4[tex]\pi[/tex]? What allows

  • Thread starter Thread starter candice_84
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Explain Integrate
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The integration over 4π is essential for calculating the total solid angle in three-dimensional space, representing all possible directions. In contrast, 2π corresponds to the solid angle of a hemisphere. The concept is crucial in fields such as neutron transport, where the angular flux, denoted as φ(r,E,Ω), is integrated over the solid angle to yield scalar flux. This integration assumes uniform neutron production and movement, emphasizing the importance of understanding solid angles in physics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of solid angles and their mathematical representation
  • Familiarity with the concept of angular flux in neutron transport
  • Basic knowledge of spherical geometry and its applications
  • Awareness of the relationship between radians and steradians
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the mathematical derivation of solid angles in three-dimensional space
  • Explore the application of angular flux in neutron transport theory
  • Learn about the implications of uniform neutron movement in physical models
  • Investigate the differences between scalar and vector flux in radiation physics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, nuclear engineers, and students studying neutron transport and solid geometry will benefit from this discussion.

candice_84
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
Can Someone explain Why we integrate over 4\pi? What allows us to get rid of Omega?
 

Attachments

  • 1.jpg
    1.jpg
    7.6 KB · Views: 443
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org


One is simply integration over all 'directions'. 4π is just the total solid angle, which represents all directions/orientations.
 


2pi = 360 which is enough.
 
Last edited:


candice_84 said:
2pi = 360 which is enough.

2 pi in 2D, not 3D.

In 3D, 2 pi is half the solid angle encompassed by a sphere, i.e. hemisphere.

Think - the area of a sphere is 4pi r2, where r is the radius.

Note, when one refers to
\phi(r,E,\vec{\Omega})
one is referring to the angular flux in n/cm2-s-(unit E)-steradian.

Integrating over the solid angle gives the 'scalar' flux.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron_transport
 
Last edited:


solid angle is a volume?
 


candice_84 said:
solid angle is a volume?
No solid angle is the solid angle, like angle is angle in 2D. The 4π (steradians) solid angle is the 3D analog to 2π radians in 2D.

The total solid angle would be the area of a sphere divided by r2, i.e. A/r2 = 4πr2/r2 = 4π, just like 2π = circumference (2π r) of the circle divided by r.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steradian
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solid_angle

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/SolidAngle.html
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Radian.html
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Angle.html
 


This integration is only correct if we assume neutrons are produce and move uniformly. Its better to not convert it to scalar format, am i right?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K