Can Spinning a Conductor Between Charged Plates Generate Current?

AI Thread Summary
Spinning a conductor between charged plates can potentially generate a current due to changes in capacitance as the conductor rotates. The capacitance will vary based on the orientation of the conductor, leading to a change in voltage that creates an alternating current. This current behaves like that of a dipole antenna in an alternating electric field, with energy extraction requiring a connection at the midpoint of the conductor. However, the situation differs from traditional electromagnetic induction generators, as the mechanisms and assumptions involved are not directly comparable. Understanding the distinct meanings of "induced" in electrostatics and magnetics is crucial for accurate analysis.
askingask
Messages
90
Reaction score
5
TL;DR Summary
This is not a friction machine nor an influence machine.
If I place a conductor between charged plates, spin the conductor or plates and connect the conductor with terminals, would I generate a current?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
askingask said:
If I place a conductor between charged plates, spin the conductor or plates and connect the conductor with terminals, would I generate a current?
If the conductor does not remain on an equipotential, then there may be capacitive displacement currents in the wire.

Those currents will not flow through the terminals and any external circuit because the conductor will be a shorter circuit.

Draw a diagram and show the axis of rotation.
 
IMG_2136.png

Blue: capacitor plates
Yellow: conductor
Black arrows: rotation of conductor

If this doesn‘t work, then electromagnetic induction generators shouldn‘t work aswell I thought.
 
I assume the capacitor plates have a fixed charge.

As the conductor rotates, the capacitance between the plates will be changed. With the conductor parallel to the plates, the capacitance will be that of a parallel plate capacitor. With the conductor perpendicular to the plates, the capacitance will be slightly higher because the plate separation will be less near the conductor.
Capacitance is defined by; C = Q / V ; so V = Q / C ; dv = Q / dc .
The plate voltage will therefore change as the conductor rotates, because the plate capacitance changes. The voltage change will be an asymmetric ripple, at twice the rotation frequency, subtracted from the initial plate voltage.

The conductor will be reversed twice by each rotation, so the charge distribution induced on the surface of the conductor must alternate. An alternating current will therefore flow in the conductor, which has become a dipole antenna in an alternating electric field.

To extract energy from the dipole, terminals would NOT be connected to the ends of the dipole conductor, rather the dipole would be cut at its midpoint, where a low impedance two wire transmission line would be connected. The energy extracted by that line, would tend to oppose the mechanical rotation of the dipole.

That is only a first order analysis. Currents and voltages will change in magnitude and phase as energy is extracted.
 
askingask said:
If this doesn‘t work, then electromagnetic induction generators shouldn‘t work aswell I thought.
The two situations are quite different, so that is not a valid assumption.

Do not get confused by the term "induced". It has different meanings in electrostatics and magnetics.
 
Baluncore said:
The two situations are quite different, so that is not a valid assumption.

Do not get confused by the term "induced". It has different meanings in electrostatics and magnetics.
What I mean by that, is that the the b field is responsible for the lorentz force which moves the electrons to one side. This should create an e field opposing the lorentz force.
 
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
Thread 'Electromagnet magnetic field issue'
Hi Guys We are a bunch a mechanical engineers trying to build a simple electromagnet. Our design is based on a very similar magnet. However, our version is about 10 times less magnetic and we are wondering why. Our coil has exactly same length, same number of layers and turns. What is possibly wrong? PIN and bracket are made of iron and are in electrical contact, exactly like the reference design. Any help will be appreciated. Thanks. edit: even same wire diameter and coil was wounded by a...
Thread 'Beauty of old electrical and measuring things, etc.'
Even as a kid, I saw beauty in old devices. That made me want to understand how they worked. I had lots of old things that I keep and now reviving. Old things need to work to see the beauty. Here's what I've done so far. Two views of the gadgets shelves and my small work space: Here's a close up look at the meters, gauges and other measuring things: This is what I think of as surface-mount electrical components and wiring. The components are very old and shows how...
Back
Top