Can Static Electricity Provide Continuous Useful Power?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility of using static electricity as a continuous power source. Participants explore theoretical and practical aspects, including the design of structures for charge collection and comparisons with other energy sources like solar power.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that the amount of current obtainable from static electricity is minimal, with one noting a lack of experimental data on current under varying weather conditions.
  • Others propose that the size and design of structures, such as skyscrapers, could influence the amount of static charge collected, raising the question of whether such structures could produce usable power.
  • A participant argues that using a solar cell would be more practical than relying on static electricity, citing the low average atmospheric flux.
  • Some contributions mention anecdotal evidence of static discharge being used to recharge batteries in ham radios, suggesting that while static electricity can be harnessed, its practical application may be limited.
  • One participant expresses curiosity about calculating potential outputs from a hypothetical building designed to collect static charge, questioning factors like voltage gradient and resistance to lightning.
  • Another participant emphasizes the distinction between static discharge and the ability to provide continuous power, arguing that while static shocks can be significant, they do not translate to useful energy output.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views, with no clear consensus on the viability of static electricity as a continuous power source. Some agree on the limitations of static electricity, while others remain optimistic about its potential when applied to large structures.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the average atmospheric flux is highly variable depending on environmental conditions, which may affect the feasibility of using static electricity for power generation. There are also unresolved questions regarding the calculations and assumptions needed to evaluate potential outputs from designed structures.

Computer science news on Phys.org
tortamuss said:

I believe that the amount of current that you can get from this is quite small (unless you count a lightning strike!). I didn't see any experimental or calculated data to show the current available under different weather conditions...
 
It would seem the size and design of the structure used to collect a charge would determine it's output. Large structure, large capacity?

Could a skyscraper that was isolated and specifically designed to collect static charge produce useable power? I guess that is the root of my question.

In my field, I design and build fairly large temporary structures that require static grounds for safety. As I understand it, the charge can be significant.
 
Wouldn't it be easier to buy a 10$ solar cell at Radio Shack?

The average atmospheric flux is on the order of 10-6 amps per square meter [Feynman discusses this in his lecture series in the chapter on lightning]. So no, it would not be practical to use this as a power source.
 
That's a lot of sky scrapers...

I found this. It provides some interesting details on the subject.

http://f3wm.free.fr/sciences/jefimenko.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You know, for once the Mythbusters did it right; get a huge antenna and you can get a volt or two. I think they ran a couple hundred feet and could JUST power a watch.

Hell, you could do better with a black rubber bag in the sun, filled with water.
 
The more I read and see, the more feel that all large structures hold the potential to generate use-able power and could be designed to do so. Perhaps the Egyptians had it right...

 
Last edited by a moderator:
tortamuss said:
The more I read and see, the more feel that all large structures hold the potential to generate use-able power and could be designed to do so. Perhaps the Egyptians had it right...



That's trivial energy. Please do not post misinformation here. That is against the PF Rules (see the Rules link at the top of the page).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #10
I'm sorry if I came off wrong. Just trying to learn, and I thought the video was "neat".

Is this possible to calculate using the average atmospheric flux?

Math test... :0

Take a rectangular office building 100m x 100m x 200m(tall) with a glass exterior. (90,000 square meters of surface with the top). All the glass is isolated from the structure and is wired to discharge back to power positive. (perhaps factoring in 10kph wind at STP as well)

Simple, but would it work at all? What's the per second output?

Is voltage gradient from altitude (200m=2000v) a factor?

Does the interior (behind the glass) create a vector field?

Is it resistant to lightning?

... or would it do nothing but repel dust? :p
 
  • #11
Last post. Last thought.


Here's the problem causing my confusion: Thousands and thousands of HAM raido ops around the globe use static discharge from their antennas to reharege 12v emergency batteries.

http://www.google.com/webhp?rls=ig#...=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&fp=aab0347a3953e8d5

video of antenna discharge.

http://www.google.com/webhp?rls=ig#...=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&fp=aab0347a3953e8d5


and

The average atmospheric flux is highly variable depending on environment and location. Static electricity is prevalent and poses a danger in the desert. It is caused by atmospheric conditions coupled with an inability to ground out due to dryness of the terrain, and air born dust.

http://www.armystudyguide.com/conte...neous_Presentations/desert-operations-2.shtml

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22593550/

Or polar regions... etc... I lost the link to G.E. polar research papers. sick of google. If anyone can find it, it states the charge is highly elevated.

My last argument comes from personal experience. I build and design large aluminum structures that are coered in vinyl. I'm sure you've seen one. They set upon 6 inch thick wood pads so it is not grounded until I decide to install the ground myself. At times I have installed the ground late in the build due to circumstance.

I have had the **** knocked out of me by static discharge on many occasions. This is NOT a lie... (Next build, I'm going to toss my meter between the building and ground before I install the permanent static ground)

... Sorry if I'm being a pain, really, I'm more currious as an electrition and builder. I am simply trying to develop a baseline formula for a simple structure at average, then add variables. This has been a mental exercise for me, not trying to "save the world" here. I know the power is useable to a degree, but how much?

If I'm a crack-pot fool, so be it:smile:
 
  • #12
Don't confuse a static discharge with the ability to provide continuous (and useful) levels of power.

You get such a 'violent' shock because it's allowed to build up. The overall draw really isn't that useful though. If you constantly Earth such items, you'd note insignificant values (if anything) on your equipment.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
836
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
6K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K