Can the only reaction force (to gravity) be friction?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between gravitational force and friction in a vertical pipe scenario. It establishes that while friction can counteract gravity, it is not the sole reaction force; the gravitational force exerted by the object on the Earth is also a reaction. The force of static friction is necessary to maintain equilibrium, but it does not always equal its maximum value, which is determined by the coefficient of static friction. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding net forces and equilibrium conditions in mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Newton's Laws of Motion
  • Static Friction Coefficient
  • Equilibrium Conditions in Mechanics
  • Free Body Diagrams
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of Newton's Laws of Motion in detail.
  • Learn how to calculate static friction using the friction coefficient.
  • Explore equilibrium conditions and their applications in mechanical systems.
  • Practice drawing and interpreting free body diagrams for various scenarios.
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, mechanical engineers, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of forces in equilibrium situations.

Jeviah
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If you have an object say in a vertical pipe, which only has a gravitational force acting on it would the reaction forces only be friction forces?
If this is the case how would you calculate the forces? would you calculate the friction force using the friction coefficient or just take Fy as friction?

Homework Equations


Friction F=Friction coefficient * F(n)
Fy= F*sin(theta)

The Attempt at a Solution


I would say that all forces acting against gravity would be friction forces, also assuming the object is at equilibrium then static friction would act in an upwards direction.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The force of static friction is what is necessary to provide the observed acceleration. It has a maximum value related to the coefficient of static friction, but this does not mean that it is always equal to this maximum value for the same reason that if you have you have a credit card with a limit of $5,000 it doesn't mean that every time you buy something you have to charge $5,000. Consider a magnet stuck to a refrigerator. If the magnet is at rest, the force of static friction is equal to the weight of the magnet, no more no less, i.e. what is necessary to provide zero acceleration.

On edit: This force of friction is not the reaction force to gravity pulling on the magnet. The reaction force to the magnet's weight is the gravitational force that the magnet exerts on the Earth.
 
Jeviah said:
I would say that all forces acting against gravity would be friction forces, also assuming the object is at equilibrium then static friction would act in an upwards direction.

frictional forces have a way to act...it always act at the surface of contact and its

direction is against the direction of possible movement..

you can not pre fix its way to act.
 
kuruman said:
The force of static friction is what is necessary to provide the observed acceleration. It has a maximum value related to the coefficient of static friction, but this does not mean that it is always equal to this maximum value for the same reason that if you have you have a credit card with a limit of $5,000 it doesn't mean that every time you buy something you have to charge $5,000. Consider a magnet stuck to a refrigerator. If the magnet is at rest, the force of static friction is equal to the weight of the magnet, no more no less, i.e. what is necessary to provide zero acceleration.

On edit: This force of friction is not the reaction force to gravity pulling on the magnet. The reaction force to the magnet's weight is the gravitational force that the magnet exerts on the Earth.
Thank you for the quick response i understand. I do have another question though, for the object not to move it has to be in equilibrium as you have said, if there are 3 points of contact with a surface, two on the right hand side and one of the left would the sum of friction force on the right hand side have to be relatively balanced with the contact point on the left? Or could the left be say 1N, the right hand side 1000N with the weight being a total of 1001N?
 
I'm finding it difficult to understand the situation you are describing..

Jeviah said:

Homework Statement


If you have an object say in a vertical pipe, which only has a gravitational force acting on it would the reaction forces only be friction forces?

If something _only_ has gravity acting on it then it _only_ has gravity acting on it. No friction, no springs, no other forces acting on it, only gravity.

If the object isn't accelerating vertically then the net force acting on it must be zero because of Newton's law...

Fnet = mass * acceleration

That implies there must be another vertical force in addition to gravity to make the total zero, but it doesn't have to be friction. If the object is an air tight fit in the pipe then air pressure below the object might prevent it falling.

The problem seems badly specified.
 
Jeviah said:
Thank you for the quick response i understand. I do have another question though, for the object not to move it has to be in equilibrium as you have said, if there are 3 points of contact with a surface, two on the right hand side and one of the left would the sum of friction force on the right hand side have to be relatively balanced with the contact point on the left? Or could the left be say 1N, the right hand side 1000N with the weight being a total of 1001N?
Newton's law also applies to rotation as well as translation.

If the object doesn't have angular acceleration then the net torque must be zero. If that's what you mean by the left and right forces being in balance then yes.

PS: Perhaps draw a free body diagram of the object.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
43
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
1K