Can the Sum of Matrix Ranks Be Greater Than n When AB Equals Zero?

  • Thread starter Thread starter calorimetry
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    rank
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the properties of two nxn matrices A and B such that their product AB equals zero. It is established that the sum of the ranks of A and B is less than or equal to n, formally expressed as rank A + rank B ≤ n. Additionally, it is proven that if A is a singular matrix, for every integer k satisfying rank A ≤ k ≤ n, there exists a matrix B such that AB = 0 and rank A + rank B = k. This highlights the relationship between matrix rank and nullity in linear algebra.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of matrix rank and nullity concepts
  • Familiarity with linear transformations and their properties
  • Knowledge of singular and invertible matrices
  • Proficiency in using the rank-nullity theorem
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the rank-nullity theorem in detail
  • Explore properties of singular matrices and their implications
  • Investigate examples of matrices A and B that satisfy AB = 0
  • Learn about linear transformations and their geometric interpretations
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for students and educators in linear algebra, mathematicians exploring matrix theory, and anyone involved in theoretical computer science or applied mathematics focusing on matrix operations.

calorimetry
Messages
30
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


a)Let A and B be nxn matrices such that AB=0. Prove that rank A + rank B <=n.
b)Prove that if A is a singular nxn matrix, then for every k satifying rank A<=k<=n there exists an nxn matrix B such that AB=0 and rank A + rank B = k.


Homework Equations



rank A + dim Nul A = n
Not sure if it's even helpful here.

The Attempt at a Solution


So I am pretty much stuck right now, if someone could point in the right direction, it would be greatly appreciative.

For part (a) I realized that NOT both A and B are invertible, if one of them is invertible, then the other must be the zero matrix so the condition holds. So I was thinking of checking the condition when A and B are not invertible, which doesn't really give me much information to work with.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rank(B)=dim(range(B)), right? If AB=0 then range(B) has to be contained in null(A), also right? rank A + dim Nul A = n is definitely useful.
 
Ah thank you, it's so simple when you put it like that. :D
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
10K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
20K