Can the Uncertainty Principle Prove Electrons Cannot Be Inside the Nucleus?

  • Thread starter Thread starter teleport
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electrons Nucleus
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of the uncertainty principle to demonstrate that electrons cannot be confined within the nucleus, based on the maximum energy of electrons emitted during beta decay.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of the uncertainty principle on the kinetic energy of electrons within a nucleus and question the necessary inputs for applying the principle. There is a discussion about estimating momentum uncertainty based on nuclear size and the relationship between emission energy and kinetic energy.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the concepts, sharing calculations and interpretations. Some have provided insights into the relationship between emission energy and kinetic energy, while others express uncertainty about the implications of their findings. The discussion reflects a mix of interpretations and attempts to clarify the physical picture of electron behavior in relation to the nucleus.

Contextual Notes

There are references to specific values related to nuclear size and energy, but participants acknowledge uncertainty regarding these figures. The discussion also highlights the challenge of reconciling theoretical estimates with observed values.

teleport
Messages
240
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



It is given the maximum energy of electrons emitted in beta decay. I'm asked to show using that and the uncertainty principle that electrons cannot be inside the nucleus.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I can't show my work because I don't even know how to start!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think about what the uncertainty principle would say about the kinetic energy of an electron confined in a nucleus. KE=p^2/2m.
 
For the uncertainty principle to say something about that, wouldn't it need one of two uncertainty inputs in order to return a value? But where is this input given or derived from?
 
teleport said:
For the uncertainty principle to say something about that, wouldn't it need one of two uncertainty inputs in order to return a value? But where is this input given or derived from?

The delta x corresponds to the size of the nucleus.
 
OK, by using the greatest nucleus (I believe around 15 fm but not sure of the exact number) I get a lower bound on the minimum momentum uncertainty which is greater than the upper bound on the momentum itself derived from the given max energy of electrons by about a factor of 10. Is this what you meant? If so, why is such a (although high)fractional uncertainty the answer to the impossibility of such an event from occurring? Because it's high enough?
 
Last edited:
The physical picture they are suggesting is that the electron is running around in the nucleus confined by a potential barrier which it eventually tunnels through. Which means it's emission energy should be comparable to it's kinetic energy confined in the nucleus. Like anything done with the uncertainty principle, this an estimate. But a large deviation from the estimate suggests that picture is not correct.
 
Not sure I'm following you completely. I assumed like you said that the emission energy was comparable to the kinetic energy inside the nucleus. That way I got a max value for the momentum inside the nucleus from the emission energy alone. My calculation was the estimate, so what is the value that diviates? The huge uncertainty I got? (more than 100% uncertainty relative to the momentum)
 
Maybe you should post what numbers you are getting. I'm getting that the emission energy of a confined electron is implausibly large compared with the confined electron estimate. By more than a factor of 10.
 
I substracted the rest energy, which makes it smaller if you didn't. Good thanks, I'm ok with the answer.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K