Can this car really do 0-60 in 1.97s?

  • Thread starter Thread starter waj787
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Car
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the claim that a car can achieve 0-60 mph in 1.97 seconds, as tested by MotorTrend. Calculations suggest that achieving this acceleration would require a lateral skidpad force of 1.37g, which is deemed impossible under normal conditions. The analysis assumes no mechanical losses and perfect traction, leading to a required force of 20.49kN, significantly higher than the 14.86kN the vehicle can produce. The skidpad test may not accurately reflect the car's linear acceleration capabilities, indicating that while impressive, the 0-60 time might be overstated. Overall, the feasibility of the claimed acceleration remains in question.
waj787
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
http://www.fast-autos.net/lingenfelter/lingenfelter427tt.html

http://www.motortrend.com/features/performance/112_0304_fast/index.html magazine tested it and did 0-60 in 1.97s.

http://co-project.lboro.ac.uk/users/cowy2/hostedstuff/lpe-8secVette.mov is a video of it.

This is something a mate worked out, is it accurate?
----------------------------------------------------
== Part 1 ==
0-60mph in 1.97s
Skid pad = 1.01g
Curb weight = 33 401lbs = 1 514.99kg
60mph = 96km/h = 26.7m/s

v = u + at
26.7 = 0 + a1.97
a = 26.7/1.97 = 13.53m/s
.'. 13.53/9.81 = 1.37g
.'. Need 1.37g on skidpad to accelerate that fast.

== Part 2 ==
Assuming no mechanical losses from tyres and all wheels get 100% traction, coefficient of friction u (mew) (rubber to concrete) = 1 (dry).

u = 1
F = uN
N = 1 514.99 * 9.81 = 14.86kN
.'. F = 1 * 14.86 = 14.86kN

.'. Force achieved from vehicle is 14.86kN.

Force needed from vehicle to accelerate perfectly:
F = ma
F = 1 514.99 * 13.53
F = 20.49kN

Conclusion: Impossible, unless powered by jet engines!
------------------------------------------------------

So anyone got any ideas?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The skidpad test is apparently based on a 200ft circle laptime rather than linear acceleration. It's entirely possible (probable even) that a car has better forward/backward acceleration than lateral acceleration capability.
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...

Similar threads

Back
Top