Can Tungsten Be Used as a Solution for Yellowstone's Super Volcano?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Vrbic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Volcano
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the feasibility of using tungsten as a thermal conductor in a proposed energy transfer solution for Yellowstone's supervolcano. Participants highlight that while tungsten has a thermal conductivity of 173 W/(m·K), its high cost of 200 million dollars per square meter makes it an impractical choice compared to water, which has a significantly higher heat capacity and is more efficient for energy transfer. The estimated cost of the NASA solution is around 3.5 billion dollars, but the power output from tungsten would only be about 3 kW, which is negligible. In contrast, using water for convection could yield much higher energy production.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of thermal conductivity and heat transfer principles
  • Familiarity with supervolcano dynamics and geothermal energy systems
  • Knowledge of material properties, specifically tungsten and iron
  • Basic concepts of energy production and power generation methods
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the thermal properties of alternative materials for geothermal energy transfer
  • Explore the efficiency of convection versus conduction in thermal energy systems
  • Investigate the design and operation of geothermal power plants
  • Learn about the economic implications of large-scale geothermal energy projects
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, geologists, energy policy makers, and anyone interested in geothermal energy solutions and the engineering challenges associated with supervolcanoes.

Vrbic
Messages
400
Reaction score
18
Hello,
recently I noticed an article about super volcano in Yellowstone and NASA's solution by drill and pumping water in there which will be a medium for energy transfer. I hope I have read good article with good informations. A price estimation was around 3.5 mld dollars. In my country we have build an nulcear power plant around 5 mld dollars so for me this aspect realable. Do you agree?
My main question is: Would be better to use as medium some kind of metal or alloy as a bar which would transfer thermal energy by thermal conducting?

Temperature of core is around 5000 C. A melting point of wolfram is around 4000 C so such materials exists. They have to exists, a borer has to resist such temperature. Also you need not to pump the water in there and spare energy. What is your oppinion?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Convection is much more efficient than conductivity, and water has a very high heat capacity. You can use the hot water to produce electricity - the system also works as power plant.

Tungsten has a thermal conductivity of 173 W/(m·K). A 500 m column at 500 K temperature difference between the ends (that is unrealistically high) will conduct 173 W/m2. It has a price of 200 million dollars per square meter. With 3.5 billions you can transfer about 3 kW. A negligible power. A single cubic centimeter of water per second, turned to steam, can do the same.
You could use other materials than tungsten, of course - iron has a lower thermal conductivity, but it is much cheaper. That gives you a factor ~30 mainly from the lower price. 100 kW is still a negligible power.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vrbic

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
6K
  • · Replies 152 ·
6
Replies
152
Views
11K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K