Can two photons cancel each other?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter QuasarBoy543298
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Photons
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores the concept of whether two photons can cancel each other, particularly in the context of classical electromagnetism and quantum mechanics. Participants examine the implications of phase differences, conservation of energy, and the nature of photons as electromagnetic entities.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that in classical electromagnetism, two plane waves with the same frequency and a phase difference of -1 can cancel each other, but question how this applies to photons.
  • Others challenge the idea of "identical photons up to -1 phase," asking for clarification on how such photons could be created.
  • Concerns are raised about the notion of photons "traveling next to each other," highlighting the lack of a position operator for photons in quantum mechanics.
  • Some participants argue that while localized photons can interact with devices, the interaction is not the photon itself.
  • There is a discussion about the implications of conservation of energy, with some suggesting that photons cannot truly cancel each other because they carry energy.
  • One participant notes that to achieve cancellation, one would need an "anti photon," but questions the feasibility of such a concept without violating energy conservation.
  • Another participant emphasizes that a two-photon state cannot be reduced to a vacuum state, indicating that superimposing two-photon states does not lead to cancellation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views on the nature of photons and their interactions, with no consensus reached on whether photons can cancel each other or the implications of their phase relationships.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include assumptions about the nature of photons, the definitions of phase and amplitude, and the implications of conservation laws in both classical and quantum contexts.

QuasarBoy543298
Messages
32
Reaction score
2
in classic electromagnetism, two plane waves with the same frequency and -1 phase difference can cancel each other.
due to conservation of energy, I assume that photons (that so far we have treated as sort of EM energy chunk traveling through space) can't truly cancel each other.
then, what really happens if 2 identical (up to -1 phase) photons travel next to each other.
if photons can be treated as some sort of EM wave mode, or even if we can just associate a phase to a photon, what stops them from canceling each other?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
saar321412 said:
if 2 identical (up to -1 phase) photons
What exactly do you mean by identical photons up to -1 phase? How would you make two such photons?
 
And in what sense they "travel next to each other"? I think it's a little bit problematic, since there is no position operator for photons :cat:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dale
but there are localized photons
weirdoguy said:
And in what sense they "travel next to each other"? I think it's a little bit problematic, since there is no position operator for photons :cat:
but we can have localized modes, no? After all sometimes we talk about photons coming and doing something (like in the photoelectric effect for example... )
 
What kind of QM is this?

The question assumes the photons are simultaneously in an eigenstate of position, momentum/energy, number and phase. Nope.

And didn't we go over all this in this thread?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK, Dale and weirdoguy
saar321412 said:
After all sometimes we talk about photons coming and doing something (like in the photoelectric effect for example... )
The interaction with the device is localized to the device. The interaction is not the photon.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
saar321412 said:
due to conservation of energy, I assume that photons (that so far we have treated as sort of EM energy chunk traveling through space) can't truly cancel each other.

The same argument would apply to two classical EM waves: each one carries energy, so they can't cancel each other.

I think you need to rethink your understanding of classical EM as well as quantum EM.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dale
saar321412 said:
in classic electromagnetism, two plane waves with the same frequency and -1 phase difference can cancel each other.
No, I don't think so. In classical EM homework problems you may see this, but not in the real world. How would you make two waves that have destructive interference EVERYWHERE. How is that different than nothing? How do you "make" nothing?

BTW, you left out direction and amplitude. Plane waves have those too.

Also, while we all know what you mean, "-1 phase difference" is a confusing way to describe this. In simple waves we have f(t) = A⋅sin(ωt + Φ). The phase is Φ, with values of [0,2π) radians (some like [0, 360) degrees). The amplitude is A. You could represent the "out of phase" condition with Φ1 = 0 and Φ2 = π, or with A1 = A and A2 = -1⋅A. But mixing the words phase and giving amplitude values isn't the best way to communicate this concept.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vela and Dale
DaveE said:
How would you make two waves that have destructive interference EVERYWHERE.
To expand on this, the only way to make them cancel everywhere is to produce the two waves at the same source, say an antenna.

You can indeed feed a single antenna with two amplifiers that are out of phase. Then there is no current in the antenna and no wave is produced or equivalently two completely interfering waves are produced.

So where did the energy go? Into the other amplifier. Generally this is not good for an amplifier.
 
  • #10
saar321412 said:
in classic electromagnetism, two plane waves with the same frequency and -1 phase difference can cancel each other.
due to conservation of energy, I assume that photons (that so far we have treated as sort of EM energy chunk traveling through space) can't truly cancel each other.
then, what really happens if 2 identical (up to -1 phase) photons travel next to each other.
if photons can be treated as some sort of EM wave mode, or even if we can just associate a phase to a photon, what stops them from canceling each other?

Individual photons don't have a phase in the way you're thinking. Instead, in a two photon system, each possible way of arranging the two photons has a phase (an amplitude to be more specific). If you line two photons up on top of each other, there's amplitude in the state "two photons here" and no amplitude anywhere else.

You'd need an "anti photon" in order to cancel the photon out instead of just stacking on top of it. Although, even if such a thing existed, the cancelling out would have to be more of a transformation into some other form since otherwise energy wouldn't be conserved or (even worse) reversibility would be lost.
 
  • #11
saar321412 said:
in classic electromagnetism, two plane waves with the same frequency and -1 phase difference can cancel each other.
due to conservation of energy, I assume that photons (that so far we have treated as sort of EM energy chunk traveling through space) can't truly cancel each other.
then, what really happens if 2 identical (up to -1 phase) photons travel next to each other.
if photons can be treated as some sort of EM wave mode, or even if we can just associate a phase to a photon, what stops them from canceling each other?
See https://www.physicsforums.com/threa...conservation-of-momentum.880286/#post-6420786
 
  • #12
A two-photon state is a two-photon state and not the vacuum, i.e., if you superimpose two-photon states you cannot get the vacuum. One should keep in mind that photons are (asymptotic) free Fock states of the em. field.

What of course is possible is the inverse process to pair annihilation, i.e., ##\gamma+\gamma \rightarrow \mathrm{e}^+ + \mathrm{e}^-##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dale

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • · Replies 64 ·
3
Replies
64
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
894
  • · Replies 81 ·
3
Replies
81
Views
7K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K