Can We Build an Ion Cannon in 5-10 Years?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the feasibility of constructing an ion cannon as a superweapon within the next 5-10 years. Participants conclude that, based on current technology, an ion cannon would lack significant destructive power due to atmospheric interference and high operational costs. The conversation highlights that while ion cannons are popularized in fictional contexts like the game Command and Conquer, they do not exist in any practical form. Additionally, advancements in directed energy weapons, such as lasers and microwave systems, are being explored for missile defense applications.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of ionized particles and their behavior
  • Familiarity with directed energy weapons technology
  • Knowledge of missile defense systems
  • Awareness of the limitations of current military technologies
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of ionized plasma and its applications in radar shielding
  • Explore advancements in laser and microwave weapon systems for defense
  • Investigate the physics behind atmospheric effects on projectile weapons
  • Study the implications of fictional technologies in military strategy and public perception
USEFUL FOR

Military strategists, defense technology researchers, and enthusiasts of science fiction weaponry will benefit from this discussion, particularly those interested in the practical applications and limitations of advanced weapon systems.

deoxys22
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Is it possible to build an ion cannon(it's a super weapon that orbits around the Earth in space) with the technology we currently have or will have within the next 5-10 yrs?
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
I seriously doubt that ion cannons could be made into a superweapon, because if you think about what it actually is, all it is is a stream of ionized atoms, and so will have very little destructive power (mainly because of the atmosphere), and what's more, if the weapon was fired from space, then rocket boosters would have 2 be fired at the same time to counter-act the force from accelerating the particles, and so the maintenance cost would be huge, so even if such a weapon could be made using current technology, it would cost so much that I don't think you could justify the building of it (this is especially true given how in warfare now, the enemy is rarely a nation, but terrorists).
 
deoxys22 said:
Is it possible to build an ion cannon(it's a super weapon that orbits around the Earth in space) with the technology we currently have or will have within the next 5-10 yrs?
What's an ion cannon? I play Command and Conquer, and there is something called an "ion cannon" in that game and it is a "superweapon". But the game is fiction and no such thing exists or is even on a drawing board anywhere. And as ppyadof was saying, firing ions probably wouldn't make a useful weapon.
 
russ_watters said:
What's an ion cannon? I play Command and Conquer, and there is something called an "ion cannon" in that game and it is a "superweapon". But the game is fiction and no such thing exists or is even on a drawing board anywhere. And as ppyadof was saying, firing ions probably wouldn't make a useful weapon.


Yeah, that's true. The ion cannon as depicted on that game is not really based on anything plausible. In many cases games like this usually use names that only serve as eye candy or the weapons are based on silly physics in order to balance things out to make the game more fun...
----------------------------------------------------

As for directed energy weapons in general, lasers and microwave weapons are being pursued as a form of missile defense or non-lethal weapons.

And I know they are experimenting with ionized plasma to serve as a shield against radar, since plasma absorbs it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
614
Replies
9
Views
3K