Can we extend the inequality 0 < sin x < x to sin(x/2), sin(x/5), and sin(3x)?

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
5 replies · 2K views
Leong
Messages
379
Reaction score
2
Given that 0 < sin x < x is true for 0 < x < π/2.
From the above, can we conclude that 0 < sin (x/2) < x/2? How about 0 < sin (x/5) < x/5? Why?
How about 0<sin 3x < 3x ? Why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For suitable ranges of x, sure.

If you replace x by x/2 everywhere consistently, you don't change anything, you just replaced your variable. An analogy would be to replace all "x" by "y".

0 < sin y < y is true for 0 < y < π/2
Now define y=x/2.
 
mfb said:
For suitable ranges of x, sure.

If you replace x by x/2 everywhere consistently, you don't change anything, you just replaced your variable. An analogy would be to replace all "x" by "y".

0 < sin y < y is true for 0 < y < π/2
Now define y=x/2.
Thank you very much for the explanation.
 
Leong said:
Given that 0 < sin x < x is true for 0 < x < π/2.
From the above, can we conclude that 0 < sin (x/2) < x/2? How about 0 < sin (x/5) < x/5? Why?
How about 0<sin 3x < 3x ? Why?

Yes, but you also have to change your range:

##0 < \sin x < x ## for ##0 < x < \pi/2##

Is equivalent to:

##0 < \sin x/2 < x/2 ## for ##0 < x < \pi##
 
PeroK said:
Yes, but you also have to change your range:

##0 < \sin x < x ## for ##0 < x < \pi/2##

Is equivalent to:

##0 < \sin x/2 < x/2 ## for ##0 < x < \pi##
:ok::thumbup:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dhiraj Shenoy
Leong said:
Given that 0 < sin x < x is true for 0 < x < π/2.
From the above, can we conclude that 0 < sin (x/2) < x/2? How about 0 < sin (x/5) < x/5? Why?
How about 0<sin 3x < 3x ? Why?
Essentially, as long as 0<x/2< ##\pi/2## (although this is not an iff condition) , same for 3x; you want 3x to fall within an interval where the property holds. This is essentially a change of variable.