Can we teleport a Big Mac using quantum technology?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
10 replies · 5K views
Singularity
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
This is probably not theoretical anymore, since it is possible to teleport a photon 1 m far ( since last I checked ). This could not be done however without destroying the photon at the starting end. They had to record the quantum state of the particle and send it to the receiving end. After which it was reassembled by means of this "quantum record". What I want to know is, do you think it is possible to record the quantum state of a Big Mac and have my "replicator" (Star Trek dejavu) assemble one for me?

*Edit : Found info on the physics section of Yahoo
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
whoa, whoa... back up.
I've heard nothing about the teleportation of a photon. give me a link.
 
Whoa, a bit out of date. We've 'teleported' 1 trillion atoms.

http://www.aip.org/enews/physnews/2001/split/558-1.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Does this quantum entangling hhave anything to do with string theory?
 
Originally posted by Brad_Ad23
Whoa, a bit out of date. We've 'teleported' 1 trillion atoms.

http://www.aip.org/enews/physnews/2001/split/558-1.html

No teleportation took place there; just entanglement.

There have been other experiments that partially or possibly teleported individual particles, but the Australian team was the first to develope a real teleportation technique.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Entanglement and teleportation are very related phenomenon actually. Yes they are separate entities, but when you get to macroscopic sizes, entanglement is what you have to do to get teleportation.


edit:

If you read the link about the aussies, you will see that is what they did also, they used entanglement.
 
Could some one explain what entanglement is? Thanks.
 
hmmmm.

it's a little to sketchy for me... i think i don't understand QM well enough to make a sound judgement on this on.