Can you assist with solving an infinite resistor network problem?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving an infinite resistor network problem involving resistances R_0 and R_1. The equivalent resistance of the network is established as R_{eq} = R_1 + √(R_1² + 2R_1R_0). The method involves recognizing that extending the network does not change the equivalent resistance, allowing for the simplification of the network into a single resistor. A critical conclusion is that the alternative expression R_{eq} = R_1 - √(R_1² + 2R_1R_0) is invalid and must be rejected, confirming the correct formula for R_{eq}.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of series and parallel resistor combinations
  • Familiarity with algebraic manipulation and square roots
  • Basic knowledge of infinite series concepts
  • Ability to set up and solve equations involving resistances
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of equivalent resistance in infinite resistor networks
  • Learn about the application of Kirchhoff's laws in circuit analysis
  • Explore advanced topics in electrical engineering, such as network theorems
  • Investigate the implications of infinite series in other electrical components
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, physics students, and anyone interested in circuit analysis and the behavior of infinite resistor networks will benefit from this discussion.

recon
Messages
399
Reaction score
1
Could someone be so kind as to assist me in solving the following problem? I have had some basic knowledge of how the effect of multiple resistors add up in parallel in and in series, but I'm pretty much lost on how to solve this problem.

Consider an infinite network of resistors of resistances R_0 and R_1 shown in the figure.

Show that the equivalent resistance of this network is

R_{eq} = R_1 + \sqrt{{R_1}^2 + 2R_1R_0}
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since the network is infinite, if you extend the network by one more copy of the pattern, the equivalent resistance shouldn't change. So represent the network's resistance with a single resistor with Req resistance. Now, can you add 3 resistors to the Req resistor to make it back into the infinite network? The resistance of this new network is easily calculated and it should have resistance Req.

For an alternative view, replace all resistors to the right of the leftmost 3 (top, bottom, and middle) as a single resistor with resistance Req. Do you see why yuo can do that? Now, calculate the resistance of this new network in terms of Req, R0, and R1. Shouldn't the resistance of this network be equal to Req? Do you understand why this is also true? Use this to set up and equation and solve for Req.

--J
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: scottdave
Thank you. I do see it now.

Through the steps you outlined, I managed to derive the following:

R_{eq} = R_1 \pm \sqrt {{R_1}^2 + 2R_1R_0}

However, since \sqrt {R_1(R_1 + 2R_0)} \geq R_1, this means that R_{eq} = R_1 - \sqrt {{R_1}^2 + 2R_1R_0} is not valid and must be rejected.

Hence, R_{eq} = R_1 + \sqrt {{R_1}^2 + 2R_1R_0}
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: scottdave

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
9K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K