ZeroPivot
- 55
- 0
lim x->o sin(nx)/x = n for n E real numbers
i haven't seen it in any books but it works.
i haven't seen it in any books but it works.
It can be derived from this limit:ZeroPivot said:lim x->o sin(nx)/x = n for n E real numbers
i haven't seen it in any books but it works.
Usually, potential candidates for the Fields Medal must wait to see if it is awarded to them.ZeroPivot said:so I am a genuise right for inventing it?
I've seen this problem in several calculus books, so I think you're premature in saying that you invented it.ZeroPivot said:so I am a genuise right for inventing it?
Mark44 said:I've seen this problem in several calculus books, so I think you're premature in saying that you invented it.
Mark44 said:Since it has appeared as a problem in many textbooks, thousands upon thousands of students have worked it, so you can't say you invented something that many people have done before you thought of doing it.
arildno said:It is not "your" limit. It is a completely trivial corollary.
lim x->0 sin(nx)/nx = 1
You are confused if you think what has transpired here falls under the category of "hate." No one has said anything of a personal nature about you. We have made valid points that contradict your claim of inventing something.ZeroPivot said:Ok we have a lot of haters here today.
As already stated, "your" limit is well known, and is an easy corollary of the sin(x)/x limit.ZeroPivot said:All I am saying is that the standard limit: lim x->0 sin(nx)/x = n is FAAAAAAR superior than lim x->0 sin(x)/x = 1
its not trivial at all. the yahoo link provided above is not my Standard Limit and its not as simple and elegant.
ZeroPivot said:I think people here should be more open minded about discoveries you know a lot of scientist work so far they become nearsighted to great solutions and things do slip the system.