Can You Explain the Puzzle Toad Proof?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the Puzzle Toad proof, specifically the process of walkers exchanging positions along edges in a graph. The procedure involves traversing edges in increasing order of length, starting from the shortest edge $e_1$ to the longest edge $e_m$. At each stage $k$, two walkers swap positions along edge $e_k$, resulting in a total of $2m$ edges traveled. Consequently, the mean number of edges traveled per walker is calculated as $2m/n$, establishing that at least one walker must have traversed $2m/n$ or more edges.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of graph theory concepts, particularly edges and vertices.
  • Familiarity with the concept of walkers in graph traversal.
  • Basic knowledge of mathematical proofs and mean calculations.
  • Experience with the Puzzle Toad proof and its implications.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study advanced graph theory, focusing on edge traversal algorithms.
  • Explore the implications of mean value calculations in combinatorial proofs.
  • Research the Puzzle Toad proof in detail to understand its applications.
  • Learn about different types of graph traversal techniques, such as depth-first and breadth-first search.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, computer scientists, and students interested in graph theory and combinatorial proofs will benefit from this discussion.

Carl1
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
1591811875322.png
 
Technology news on Phys.org
It would be easier to understand that proof if the second sentence was made more explicit:

Then go through the edges of $E$ one by one in order, starting with the shortest edge $\color{red}e_1$ and finishing with the longest edge $\color{red}e_m$[/color] ... .​
At the $k$th stage of this procedure, when you come to the edge $e_k = (u,v)$, the walkers currently at its endpoints $u$ and $v$ change place by walking along $e_k$. If they have not previously moved then that will be the first leg of their walk. But if one or both of them have already moved during a previous stage of the procedure, they will have moved along edges shorter than $e_k$. When the procedure ends (with the walkers at the endpoints of $e_m$ changing places), each walker will have traveled along some increasingly long sequence of edges.

At stage $k$ of the procedure, two walkers travel along the edge $e_k$. So the total number of edges traveled during the whole procedure is $2m$. The number of walkers is $n$. So the mean number of edges traveled by a walker is $2m/n$, and therefore at least one of the travellers must have walked along $2m/n$ or more edges.

As the Puzzle Toad site mentions, it is indeed a beautiful proof.
 
Thank you so much. Now I understand the proof. It is beautiful.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
Replies
52
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K