Can You Fix Your Car? A Guide to Basic Troubleshooting

  • Thread starter Thread starter wolram
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the challenges and experiences of troubleshooting and repairing modern cars, particularly in the context of their complex systems involving computers and sensors. Participants share their personal experiences, knowledge, and limitations regarding car maintenance and repair, touching on both theoretical understanding and practical skills.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express frustration with the complexity of modern cars, noting that many systems are controlled by embedded computers, making repairs daunting.
  • Others share their backgrounds in auto mechanics, highlighting that their skills are limited to older vehicles or basic maintenance tasks.
  • A few participants mention specific repairs they are comfortable with, such as changing fluids and filters, while acknowledging their limitations with newer technologies.
  • There are discussions about fuel efficiency, with some questioning the effectiveness of modern systems compared to older carbureted engines, and others providing examples of vehicles that achieve high mileage.
  • Some participants reference manuals like Chilton's and Haynes, discussing their usefulness and accessibility for home repairs.
  • Humor is present in the discussion, with jokes about the challenges of understanding repair manuals and the effectiveness of unconventional repair methods.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the increasing complexity of modern cars and the challenges it poses for DIY repairs. However, there are multiple competing views regarding the effectiveness of modern technologies in improving fuel efficiency and the overall experience of car maintenance.

Contextual Notes

Some statements reflect personal experiences and subjective assessments of car repair capabilities, which may vary widely among individuals. The discussion includes assumptions about the relationship between technology and fuel efficiency that are not universally accepted.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in car maintenance, those considering purchasing a vehicle, or anyone curious about the evolution of automotive technology may find this discussion relevant.

wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
4,411
Reaction score
551
Lift the bonnet on a modern car and you see a nightmare tangle of pipes and wires, so if your car will not start would you know how to fix it?
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
I'd be pleased if I could get the bonnet open to be frank. I know less than nothing about cars. The only reason I know how the internal combustion engine works, is because I studied it in physics at school. I don't own a car, have never owned a car, and don't see myself owning one in the near future, unless a job requires it.
 
wolram said:
Lift the bonnet on a modern car and you see a nightmare tangle of pipes and wires, so if your car will not start would you know how to fix it?

So many of the systems on modern cars are run by imbedded computers, there's no way I would even try.

I grew up with seven brothers, all but two of them were very good with auto mechanics. I learned from them how to do simple things. I wasn't too bad at it, but if the car's newer than, oh, 1966, forget about it!
 
lisab said:
So many of the systems on modern cars are run by imbedded computers, there's no way I would even try.

I grew up with seven brothers, all but two of them were very good with auto mechanics. I learned from them how to do simple things. I wasn't too bad at it, but if the car's newer than, oh, 1966, forget about it!

I think some cars are smarter than the people that drive them these days. :wink:

They had one that drove round a circuit beating all the drivers on Top Gear, except the tame pro driver, without a driver, By itself!
 
Schrödinger's Dog said:
The only reason I know how the internal combustion engine works, is because I studied it in physics at school.

The Otto cycle! I loved learning that!
 
My 95 S-10 yes after I go over to my friends house and borrow his OBD scanner. As for my 07 Prius I can cheek the fluid levels and that is the extent that I'm willing to do on that car.
 
You need a laptop and an automotive scanning tool.
 
I used to be able to fix a whole lot of stuff on cars, until they got loaded with sensors, computers, etc. Rebuild/rejet carbs, etc, etc. Now I'm pretty much limited to troubleshooting simple electrical problems with my multimeter, changing fluids, changing air/oil/fuel filters, replacing belts and hoses and similar stuff.
 
So how much of this stuff is making the car better than say a car with carb and points, if each of those pipes and wires increased fuel efficiency i would expect 100mpg.
 
  • #10
wolram said:
Lift the bonnet on a modern car and you see a nightmare tangle of pipes and wires, so if your car will not start would you know how to fix it?
There's nothing that a good hammer can't fix. :biggrin: Muahahahaaaa!111
 
  • #11
wolram said:
So how much of this stuff is making the car better than say a car with carb and points, if each of those pipes and wires increased fuel efficiency i would expect 100mpg.

I think you'd have to totally redesign the engine to something else to get above 60mpg with petrol, any inventors out there? As far as I understand it, which isn't much admittedly, these days most of the technology is not for increasing MPG necessarily, in fact things like air conditioning decrease it a great deal. Hybrids do better though.
 
Last edited:
  • #12
Blue motion VW polo diesel gets 70 mpg.
 
  • #13
turbo-1 said:
I used to be able to fix a whole lot of stuff on cars, until they got loaded with sensors, computers, etc. Rebuild/rejet carbs, etc, etc. Now I'm pretty much limited to troubleshooting simple electrical problems with my multimeter, changing fluids, changing air/oil/fuel filters, replacing belts and hoses and similar stuff.
I would work on early fuel injection systems, except for the computer. I had a timing light and I used to time the engine to optimize fuel efficiency. I've worked on my Honda's where I've had to change out components like wires, plugs, distributor, alternator, cooling pump (Prelude - that was a nightmare because the part of the pump sites behind the timing belt cowling :rolleyes:), brakes (cylinders and pads), . . . .

I used to help my dad when he worked on cars (Triumph, Pontiac Lemans, Volkwagens (bug and vans), lawnmowers, and stuff.
 
  • #14
Kurdt said:
Blue motion VW polo diesel gets 70 mpg.

Really, I did change that to petrol, to be clear. But that is still pretty impressive. :bugeye:

Mind you ~60mpg with a petrol car is pretty amazing too. I checked and it's the Ford Ka that does that. Only 1.3 litre though, I can't see a lot of people driving it.
 
Last edited:
  • #15
wolram said:
Lift the bonnet on a modern car and you see a nightmare tangle of pipes and wires, so if your car will not start would you know how to fix it?


It's called a Chilton's manual.
 
  • #16
Kurdt said:
Blue motion VW polo diesel gets 70 mpg.

What kind of mileage do the red ones get :-p ?
 
  • #17
vincentm said:
It's called a Chilton's manual.

I see but to most people I would think it would be effectively written in Chinese, excepting of course Chinese people then it'd be Greek.
 
  • #18
wolram said:
So how much of this stuff is making the car better than say a car with carb and points, if each of those pipes and wires increased fuel efficiency i would expect 100mpg.

The most efficient car in the pipeline is a diesel hybrid.Several companies work on that Opel / Vauxhall has an Astra with that configuration doing 59 mpg. Peugeot with a 308 model. but my Peugeot 207 1.6 HDi is hardly any less than that (52 mpg) if I don't insist on driving faster than 80 mph. If I drive a steady 55 mph it's about 78 mpg, that would be pretty much approaching the minimum limit. You can conserve energy by electric breaking and by running the combustion engine on most efficient rpm, having the electric engine doing the variation but there is nothing you can do about the loss due to drag. For 100mpg you'd need something different.
 
  • #19
wolram said:
So how much of this stuff is making the car better than say a car with carb and points, if each of those pipes and wires increased fuel efficiency i would expect 100mpg.
There was an old joke about JC Whitney because they sold LOTS of parts that claimed to dramatically improve your gas mileage. It went something like "I'm getting such better mileage that now I have to stop every 50 miles or so to drain the fuel tank."
 
  • #20
Our previous car was a 1993 Volvo 240. I did a few basic repairs myself on it, even then I would think "jeez, things are so tightly packed in here."

Well now our family car is a Toyota Sienna. I looked under the hood (bonnet) and, WOW. I could not fit a credit card between the engine block and the air compressor! I was quite impressed how neatly things were packed together. So far I have been able to change an air filter.
 
  • #21
vincentm said:
It's called a Chilton's manual.

Or a Haynes for most home repairs. It's cheaper and includes more things than I'm qualified to do the way it is.

I wouldn't want to rebuild an engine or automatic transmission, even on an older car. I didn't even like rebuilding carburetors - there was a real good chance it would still run nearly as bad as it did before I rebuilt it. Although, one way or the other, I'd eventually get the rebuilt one working right. It just was just never a very clean process for me. Slapping on an already rebuilt carburetor gave me a much better chance of the car actually running better right away.

Likewise, I've bought transmissions from the junk yard and simply pull and replace rather than venture inside that mess. Replace a manual clutch? Maybe, if it doesn't have asbestos. An automatic? Never.

In my case, I don't have that much of a tangle of pipes and wires anyway. Jeeps aren't that hard to do self-repair on.
 
  • #22
What MPG do Jeeps get these days. :-p
 
  • #23
I used to tear apart the S&S Super E racing carburetor several times a year and tweak it, trying to get a bit of extra performance out of my old Wide-Glide. Too many "mechanics" over-size the main jets on these to try to get good top-end speed, but that causes the bikes to stumble and run rich at low RPMs because the air-flow across the venturi at low speeds is incapable of properly atomizing the fuel. (Typical butterfly carb.) I installed a Yost Power Tube (pre-atomizer) over the main jet in that carb and was able to increase the main jet bore significantly, get a lot more torque, and improve the mileage for two-up trips from 45mpg to 50 mpg. That's pretty impressive economy on a tweaked out Evolution with steep cams and custom head-work.
 
Last edited:
  • #24
Schrödinger's Dog said:
What MPG do Jeeps get these days. :-p

I hope your cat dies, you miserable troll! :mad:

Uh, I mean, a hell of lot better than a Hummer, that's for sure! :biggrin:
 
  • #25
BobG said:
I hope your cat dies, you miserable troll! :mad:

Uh, I mean, a hell of lot better than a Hummer, that's for sure! :biggrin:

That's unfair my cat died over 2 years ago. My dogs still alive though. :biggrin:

A tank gets better mileage than a hummer doesn't it. :wink:
 
  • #26
Schrödinger's Dog said:
My dogs still alive though. :biggrin:

Are you sure...have you collapsed the wave function?
 

Similar threads

Replies
46
Views
8K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
6K