Can You Interchange Derivatives and Integrals in Different Variables?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Hertz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivative Integral
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the interchangeability of derivatives and integrals in the context of a function A(x, y, z). Specifically, the participant questions whether the expression $$D_i\int{A dx_j}$$ can be simplified to $$\int{D_i(A) dx_j}$$ when i≠j. The consensus confirms that this interchange is valid under the Leibniz integral rule, which allows differentiation under the integral sign. Additionally, it is clarified that the notation ##dx_j## serves as an indicator of the variable of integration and does not behave as a constant in all contexts.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of partial derivatives and integrals
  • Familiarity with the Leibniz integral rule
  • Knowledge of Riemann integrals
  • Basic concepts of multivariable calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Leibniz integral rule in detail
  • Explore the properties of Riemann integrals
  • Learn about the implications of switching differentiation and integration
  • Investigate applications of differentiation under the integral sign in physics and engineering
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, physics, and engineering who are dealing with multivariable calculus and require a deeper understanding of the relationship between derivatives and integrals.

Hertz
Messages
180
Reaction score
8
Hi, so this is just a quick question about taking a derivative of an integral. Assume that I have some function of position ##A(x, y, z)##, then assume I am trying to simplify $$D_i\int{A dx_j}$$ where ##i≠j##. So, I'm taking the partial derivative of the integral of A, but the derivative and integral are with respect to different variables.

Considering that the integral is similar to a summation, I intuitively believe that I can take this step:
$$D_i\int{A dx_j}=\int{D_i(A dx_j)}$$

This is where I am confused. Can I take this step?:
$$\int{D_i(A dx_j)}=\int{D_i(A) dx_j}$$

I believe that this is right, but I don't exactly know why. It's as if ##dx_j## is a constant. Is this the case? I can't really see why on my own because I've seen instances where differentials depend on other differentials and obviously I've seen cases where one differential over another differential changes with position, which implies the differentials themselves change with respect to each other. I don't know, I'm just confused about how to think about this. How can I justify taking the ##dx_j## out of the ##D_i##?

Lastly, what about the reverse case, where I have ##\int{D_i(A) dx_j}## can I convert this too ##D_i\int{A dx_j}##? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The short answer is, yes - switching the order of differentiation/integration in the manner you have indicated is valid. The long answer is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leibniz_integral_rule.

Also be aware that the ##dx## in the integral notation, at least as far the Reimann integral is concerned, is not the same as the ##dx## of differentials. The integral version is more of a notational artifact that indicates the variable of integration. It's not uncommon to see the two versions mix and mingle, such as when studying differential equations or setting up physics problems and other applications problems. and most of the time it's okay because it works. But just be aware that there's a minor abuse of notation going on in those cases.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K