Can you move fast enough towards light so that it has a period of 0?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter stu dent
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light Period
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the impossibility of moving towards a beam of light at a speed that results in a wavelength period of zero. It is established that the Doppler shift factor, represented by the equation [(1-v/c)/(1+v/c)]^1/2, only equals zero when the velocity (v) equals the speed of light (c). Since it is impossible to reach or exceed the speed of light, achieving a wavelength period of zero is unattainable. The conversation also touches on the implications of relativistic effects on light and the detection of celestial objects moving towards or away from Earth.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Doppler effect in physics
  • Familiarity with the theory of relativity
  • Basic knowledge of wave mechanics
  • Concept of the speed of light as a universal constant
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the Doppler effect on light waves
  • Explore Einstein's theory of relativity and its impact on speed limits
  • Investigate methods for detecting celestial objects' movement using redshift and blueshift
  • Learn about wave-particle duality and its relation to light behavior
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of physics, and anyone interested in the fundamental principles of light and relativity.

stu dent
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
at what speed must i be moving towards a beam of light in order for the wavelength to have a period of 0?

would it be the speed of light? would it need to be greater than the speed of light? if so, what period would it be at if i were movign at the speed of light?

i mean, maybe the question is dumb, and the answer is obvious that it would be the speed of light, but with relativity, the answer seldom turns out to be obvious i find.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
stu dent said:
would it be the speed of light?

Yes. The Doppler shift factor is [(1-v/c)/(1+v/c)]1/2, which only equals zero for v=c. Since you can't move at v=c, this never happens.
 
ya.. but light does.

it's almost kind of predictable that would be the case, and yet, an interesting thought.

and predictably i guess again, as v→-c it goes to infinity.


here's a related question. how do we know whether or not there's a bunch of stuff in outer space that's moving away, or towards us, by rates of speed that would yield a period, as of yet, undetected by us? or detected by us, and yet, unrecognized.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
5K