Can You Simplify This Trigonometric Expression Further?

  • Thread starter Thread starter GreenPrint
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hard
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the factorization of a trigonometric expression involving cis functions, specifically the expression (cis(x) - cis(-x))/(2i) + (1 - cis^2(-x))/(i + i cis^2(-x)). Participants are exploring how to simplify or factor this expression further, questioning the validity of their approaches and the definitions involved.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the transformation of the original expression into simpler forms, such as sin(x) + tan(x) and sin(x)(1 + sec(x)). There is debate over whether these forms represent the most factored version of the expression. Some participants express confusion about the difference between simplification and factorization.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with various interpretations and approaches being explored. Some participants have offered insights into rewriting the expression using identities, while others are questioning the necessity of further factorization. There is no clear consensus on the most factored form, and the discussion remains active.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of homework guidelines, which may limit the methods they can use. There is also a noted confusion regarding the definitions of factoring versus simplifying, which impacts the direction of the discussion.

GreenPrint
Messages
1,186
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Factor completely
(cis(x) - cis(-x) )/(2i) + (1 - cis^2(-x))/(i + i cis^2(-x) )

Yes I know that it's just simply sin(x) + tan(x)
which equals sin(x) ( 1 + sec(x) )

but however if you write it out in it's proper form

(cis(x) - cis(-x) )/(2i) + (1 - cis^2(-x))/(i + i cis^2(-x) )

and try to factor this further you'll realize that you can factor out cis(x) and cis(-x) and what not from sine and cosine so leaving it as this

sin(x) ( 1 + sec(x) )

is wrong because you can factor further... I need help with this

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=factor+(e^(ix)-e^(-ix))/(2i)+(1+%2B+2/(+e^(ix)+%2B+e^(-ix)+)

the answer is that according to wolfram which is clearly more factored then

sin(x) ( 1 + sec(x) )

because it be factored into one fraction... which is also much more simple than three different ones =)... but regardless I need to factor that and get that answer and don't know how to...

I got down to here

-i( cis(x) (1/2 + cis(x) ) - (cis(-x)/2 + 1 ) )

so how do i get to this

-(i cis(-x) (-1+ cis(x) ) (1+ cis^3 (x) )/(2 (1+ cis^2(x)))

as you can see it's much more factored =) can you assist me to get here thanks

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
lol does anybody know how to do this?
 
GreenPrint said:

Homework Statement


Factor completely
(cis(x) - cis(-x) )/(2i) + (1 - cis^2(-x))/(i + i cis^2(-x) )

Yes I know that it's just simply sin(x) + tan(x)
which equals sin(x) ( 1 + sec(x) )

but however if you write it out in it's proper form

(cis(x) - cis(-x) )/(2i) + (1 - cis^2(-x))/(i + i cis^2(-x) )

and try to factor this further you'll realize that you can factor out cis(x) and cis(-x) and what not from sine and cosine so leaving it as this

sin(x) ( 1 + sec(x) )
Why do you think this is wrong? It's the same as what you got before. And really, you are not factoring, but instead are simplifying the original expression.
GreenPrint said:
is wrong because you can factor further... I need help with this

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=factor+(e^(ix)-e^(-ix))/(2i)+(1+%2B+2/(+e^(ix)+%2B+e^(-ix)+)

the answer is that according to wolfram which is clearly more factored then

sin(x) ( 1 + sec(x) )
?
GreenPrint said:
because it be factored into one fraction... which is also much more simple than three different ones =)... but regardless I need to factor that and get that answer and don't know how to...

I got down to here

-i( cis(x) (1/2 + cis(x) ) - (cis(-x)/2 + 1 ) )

so how do i get to this

-(i cis(-x) (-1+ cis(x) ) (1+ cis^3 (x) )/(2 (1+ cis^2(x)))

as you can see it's much more factored =) can you assist me to get here thanks
Why would you want to get there?
To simplify the original expression, replace the cis expressions, using cis(x) = cos(x) + i sin(x), and cis(-x) = cos(-x) + i sin(-x) = cos(x) - i sin(x). Here I'm using the identities cos(-x) = cos(x) and sin(-x) = - sin(x).

I was able to rewrite the original expression as sin(x) + tan(x), which you point out is equal to sin(x)(1 + sec(x)). Either of these would be good answers.
 
isn't this more factored because the sis function has been factored
like I would say that
-(i e^(-i x) (-1+e^(i x)) (1+e^(i x))^3)/(2 (1+e^(2 i x)))
was more factored than
sin(x)(1 + sec(x))
because you can factor out the sis function... ?
and I don't know how to get to
-(i e^(-i x) (-1+e^(i x)) (1+e^(i x))^3)/(2 (1+e^(2 i x)))
and when I tried I got to
-i( cis(x) (1/2 + cis(x) ) - (cis(-x)/2 + 1 ) )
and am stuck and was wanting to know how to get to the answer three lines above from there because I don't know how to factor further from that point =( and get that answer
 
GreenPrint said:
isn't this more factored because the sis function has been factored
like I would say that
-(i e^(-i x) (-1+e^(i x)) (1+e^(i x))^3)/(2 (1+e^(2 i x)))
was more factored than
sin(x)(1 + sec(x))
because you can factor out the sis function... ?
Do you understand what factoring means?

When you factor an expression, you write it as a product of two or more expressions. For example, x2 + 5x + 6 can be factored to (x + 3)(x + 2).
 
Yes I do think so =)

see I put this in
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=factor+sin(x)+++tan(x)
and was like well that better equal

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=factor+(e^(ix)+-+e^(-ix))/(2i)+%2B+(1+-+e^(-2ix)+)/(i+%2B+i+e^(-2x))

hmm that is odd
looks like i forgot the to square it in the first post I'll edit the link
 
Last edited:
It seems to me that you have this need to make things as complicated as possible, the exact opposite of simplification...
 
hmmm nope let's see here
 
Last edited:
sin(x) + tan(x) is the simplest of the bunch. I have no idea whether any of the others are actually equal to sin(x) + tan(x).
 
  • #10
hmmm so what is the most factored form? My head hurts =_=
 
  • #11
Divide both the numerator and the denominator of the second factor by cis(-x) and use that 1/cis(-x)=cis(+x).

ehild
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
20K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K