Can You Simplify This Trigonometric Expression Further?

  • Thread starter Thread starter GreenPrint
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hard
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
10 replies · 2K views
GreenPrint
Messages
1,186
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Factor completely
(cis(x) - cis(-x) )/(2i) + (1 - cis^2(-x))/(i + i cis^2(-x) )

Yes I know that it's just simply sin(x) + tan(x)
which equals sin(x) ( 1 + sec(x) )

but however if you write it out in it's proper form

(cis(x) - cis(-x) )/(2i) + (1 - cis^2(-x))/(i + i cis^2(-x) )

and try to factor this further you'll realize that you can factor out cis(x) and cis(-x) and what not from sine and cosine so leaving it as this

sin(x) ( 1 + sec(x) )

is wrong because you can factor further... I need help with this

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=factor+(e^(ix)-e^(-ix))/(2i)+(1+%2B+2/(+e^(ix)+%2B+e^(-ix)+)

the answer is that according to wolfram which is clearly more factored then

sin(x) ( 1 + sec(x) )

because it be factored into one fraction... which is also much more simple than three different ones =)... but regardless I need to factor that and get that answer and don't know how to...

I got down to here

-i( cis(x) (1/2 + cis(x) ) - (cis(-x)/2 + 1 ) )

so how do i get to this

-(i cis(-x) (-1+ cis(x) ) (1+ cis^3 (x) )/(2 (1+ cis^2(x)))

as you can see it's much more factored =) can you assist me to get here thanks

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
lol does anybody know how to do this?
 
GreenPrint said:

Homework Statement


Factor completely
(cis(x) - cis(-x) )/(2i) + (1 - cis^2(-x))/(i + i cis^2(-x) )

Yes I know that it's just simply sin(x) + tan(x)
which equals sin(x) ( 1 + sec(x) )

but however if you write it out in it's proper form

(cis(x) - cis(-x) )/(2i) + (1 - cis^2(-x))/(i + i cis^2(-x) )

and try to factor this further you'll realize that you can factor out cis(x) and cis(-x) and what not from sine and cosine so leaving it as this

sin(x) ( 1 + sec(x) )
Why do you think this is wrong? It's the same as what you got before. And really, you are not factoring, but instead are simplifying the original expression.
GreenPrint said:
is wrong because you can factor further... I need help with this

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=factor+(e^(ix)-e^(-ix))/(2i)+(1+%2B+2/(+e^(ix)+%2B+e^(-ix)+)

the answer is that according to wolfram which is clearly more factored then

sin(x) ( 1 + sec(x) )
?
GreenPrint said:
because it be factored into one fraction... which is also much more simple than three different ones =)... but regardless I need to factor that and get that answer and don't know how to...

I got down to here

-i( cis(x) (1/2 + cis(x) ) - (cis(-x)/2 + 1 ) )

so how do i get to this

-(i cis(-x) (-1+ cis(x) ) (1+ cis^3 (x) )/(2 (1+ cis^2(x)))

as you can see it's much more factored =) can you assist me to get here thanks
Why would you want to get there?
To simplify the original expression, replace the cis expressions, using cis(x) = cos(x) + i sin(x), and cis(-x) = cos(-x) + i sin(-x) = cos(x) - i sin(x). Here I'm using the identities cos(-x) = cos(x) and sin(-x) = - sin(x).

I was able to rewrite the original expression as sin(x) + tan(x), which you point out is equal to sin(x)(1 + sec(x)). Either of these would be good answers.
 
isn't this more factored because the sis function has been factored
like I would say that
-(i e^(-i x) (-1+e^(i x)) (1+e^(i x))^3)/(2 (1+e^(2 i x)))
was more factored than
sin(x)(1 + sec(x))
because you can factor out the sis function... ?
and I don't know how to get to
-(i e^(-i x) (-1+e^(i x)) (1+e^(i x))^3)/(2 (1+e^(2 i x)))
and when I tried I got to
-i( cis(x) (1/2 + cis(x) ) - (cis(-x)/2 + 1 ) )
and am stuck and was wanting to know how to get to the answer three lines above from there because I don't know how to factor further from that point =( and get that answer
 
GreenPrint said:
isn't this more factored because the sis function has been factored
like I would say that
-(i e^(-i x) (-1+e^(i x)) (1+e^(i x))^3)/(2 (1+e^(2 i x)))
was more factored than
sin(x)(1 + sec(x))
because you can factor out the sis function... ?
Do you understand what factoring means?

When you factor an expression, you write it as a product of two or more expressions. For example, x2 + 5x + 6 can be factored to (x + 3)(x + 2).
 
Yes I do think so =)

see I put this in
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=factor+sin(x)+++tan(x)
and was like well that better equal

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=factor+(e^(ix)+-+e^(-ix))/(2i)+%2B+(1+-+e^(-2ix)+)/(i+%2B+i+e^(-2x))

hmm that is odd
looks like i forgot the to square it in the first post I'll edit the link
 
Last edited:
hmmm nope let's see here
 
Last edited:
hmmm so what is the most factored form? My head hurts =_=