MHB Can You Solve the Challenging Math Problem from POTW #168?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Euge
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    2015
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on a challenging math problem from the Problem of the Week (POTW) #168, which involves proving a relationship between two functions, u and v, defined on a domain in R². A correction was made to the problem statement, specifically adding missing terms in the integrals, making it solvable. Despite the correction, no participants managed to solve the problem. The original poster has provided their own solution for reference. The thread emphasizes the importance of accurate problem formulation in mathematical discussions.
Euge
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
2,072
Reaction score
245
Here is this week's POTW:

-----
Let $X$ be a domain in $\Bbb R^2$. Suppose $u,v \in C^2(X\to\Bbb R)$ such that

$$\oint_c uv\frac{\partial v}{\partial \mathbf{n}}\, ds = -\frac{1}{2}\oint_c v^2\frac{\partial u}{\partial \mathbf{n}}\, ds$$

for every simple closed curve $c$ in $X$. Prove that to every $\varepsilon > 0$, there corresponds a subharmonic function $h_\varepsilon$ on $X$ such that

$$u(x,y)v(x,y)^2 + h_\varepsilon(x,y) = \varepsilon(x^2 + y^2)$$

for all $(x,y)\in X$.
-----

Remember to read the http://www.mathhelpboards.com/showthread.php?772-Problem-of-the-Week-%28POTW%29-Procedure-and-Guidelines to find out how to http://www.mathhelpboards.com/forms.php?do=form&fid=2!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi MHB,

I've made a correction to the problem by placing missing $v$'s in the integrals above. Now the problem is doable. My apologies for the error.
 
No one solved this week's problem. You can read my solution below.
First I'll show $uv^2$ is harmonic. Suppose to the contrary that $uv^2$ is not harmonic on $X$. Without loss of generality, assume $\Delta (uv^2)(x_0) > 0$ for some $x_0 \in X$. Then there is an open disc $D(x_0)$ in $X$ containing $x_0$ such that $\Delta (uv^2) > 0$ on $D(x_0)$. If $c$ is the circle which bounds $D(x_0)$, then

$$ \oint_c \left(uv\frac{\partial v}{\partial \mathbf{n}}\, ds + \frac{1}{2}v^2\frac{\partial u}{\partial \mathbf{n}}\right)\, ds = \oint_c \left(\frac{1}{2}u\frac{\partial v^2}{\partial \mathbf{n}} + \frac{1}{2}v^2\frac{\partial u}{\partial \mathbf{n}}\right)\, ds = \frac{1}{2}\oint_c \frac{\partial (uv^2)}{\partial \mathbf{n}}\, ds = \frac{1}{2}\iint_{D(x_0)} \Delta (uv^2) > 0,$$

a contradiction.

Since $uv^2$ is harmonic on $X$, for a given $\epsilon > 0$, the function $h_\varepsilon : X \to \Bbb R$ defined by $h_\varepsilon(x,y) = \varepsilon(x^2 + y^2) - u(x,y)v(x,y)^2$ is $C^2(X\to \Bbb R)$ such that $\Delta h_\varepsilon = 4\varepsilon > 0$ on $X$. Hence, $h_\varepsilon$ is subharmonic on $X$, and satisfies the equation $u(x,y)v(x,y)^2 + h_\varepsilon(x,y) = \varepsilon(x^2 + y^2)$ in $X$.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K