Can You Solve This Plane Geometry Problem Involving an Acute-Angled Triangle?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a plane geometry problem involving an acute-angled triangle PQR with specific angle and orthocenter properties. The problem requires demonstrating that PT equals twice the length of QR, using geometric relationships and properties of triangles. Key points include establishing that quadrilateral HRTQ is a parallelogram and that triangles NPQ and PRT are isosceles. The conclusion drawn is that PT is indeed twice the length of PQ, leading to the final result PT = 2QR. The solution effectively combines properties of midpoints and angles in triangle geometry.
aniketp
Messages
84
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,
Can anyone solve the followong by plane Euclidean geometry?
I got it by co-ordinate geometry, but couldn't get it by plane...
>In an acute - angled triangle PQR , angle P=\pi/6 , H is the orthocentre, and M is the midpoint of QR . On the line HM , take a point T such that HM=MT. Show that PT=2QR.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Connect points T and R.
Connect points T and Q.
Quadrilateral HRTQ is a parallelogram because HM = MT and MR = MQ.

Thus
TR is perpendicular to PR, and
TQ is perpendicular to PQ.

Let N be the midpoint of PT.
Connect points N and R.
Connect points NQ.
In right triangle PRT, NR = PT/2.
In right triangle PQT, NQ = PT/2

So NR = NQ = PT/2
Thus triangle PQN is isosceles.

Now we will show that < RNQ = 60 degrees.
(note that < NPR = < NRP and < NPQ = < NQP)
< RNQ = < RNT + < QNT
= < NPR + < NRP + < NPQ + < NQP
= 2( < NPR + < NPQ)
= 2 < RPQ
= 2*30
= 60

So triangle NPQ is equilateral
Thus PQ = NQ

As NQ = PT/2
So PQ = PT/2
PT = 2PQ

http://www.idealmath.com
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top