Cannon shoots a bullet. What if it's not fixed to the platform?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a cannon and a bullet, specifically addressing the dynamics when the cannon is not fixed to a platform. Participants are exploring the implications of energy distribution between the bullet and the cannon in different scenarios.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the derivation of expressions related to the problem, with some questioning the correctness of specific variables used in the equations. There is an emphasis on understanding how energy is shared between the bullet and the cannon.

Discussion Status

There is a constructive dialogue with participants offering feedback on the clarity of the original post and suggesting improvements. Some guidance has been provided regarding the formulation of expressions, but no consensus has been reached on the specific details of the equations.

Contextual Notes

One participant notes their inexperience with forum posting, indicating a learning curve in presenting their work clearly. There is also mention of potential confusion due to the formatting of the original post.

Ariano AnnaG
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
A cannon is initially attached to a fixed platform (ignore the recoil). Its mass is 5800 kg.
The cannon shoots a bullet(mass=85 kg), and its speed is 551 m/s.
If the cannon is not fixed to the platform anymore, what is the speed of the bullet now?


Is the attempt at the solution shown in the attached photo well organized and correct? Should I add other explanation or diagrams to improve it?
Relevant Equations
K=K' (kinetic energy)
q=q' (momentum)
241029
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First it's not easy to read your solution with all the squares interfering. Please use plain white paper if you post more photos of your work.

Your solution is not easy to follow but it is correct. You may consider using sentences here and there to explain what you are doing. For example, you might say something like "The same amount of energy that is imparted to only the bullet in the first case is divided between the bullet and the cannon in the second case."

I congratulate you on deriving the expression in terms of symbols before substituting the numbers. That's as it should be.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Nik_2213
kuruman said:
I congratulate you on deriving the expression in terms of symbols before substituting the numbers. That's as it should be.
I second that, but I think you have ##v_{B_2}## on the right instead of ##v_{B_1}##, and you could simplify to ##\frac{v_{B_1}}{\sqrt{1+\frac{m_B}{m_C}}}##.
 
Thank you so much for your replies kuruman and haruspex despite the wrong organization of the post, I'm so sorry about that, I'm new to the forum but I promise I will learn from my mystakes.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
990
  • · Replies 84 ·
3
Replies
84
Views
5K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K