Graduate Can't find eigenvalues for s-wave superconductor

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the challenges of finding eigenvalues for a Hamiltonian related to s-wave superconductors, specifically referencing a paper's equation 12. The author describes their method, which includes performing a Fourier transform, expanding on sigma and k, and simplifying terms based on square lattice assumptions. Despite using Wolfram|Alpha to compute the eigenvalues, the author encounters an issue with a nested square root that lacks symmetry in k, contrary to their advisor's expectations. They express frustration over repeated reviews of their work yielding no mistakes, leading to a request for external input on resolving the issue. The complexity of ensuring symmetry in the matrix remains a key concern in their calculations.
Frigorifico
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
I'm close to the eigenvalues of this hamiltonian, but I can't quite get them right
I have this hamiltonian whose eigenvalues I wanna find. If you are curious it's equation 12 in this paper

I've attached a pdf showing what I did, really all that matters is the very end, the last matrix and equations 19 and 20, but in case a summary would be useful:

1.- Get the fourier transform

2.- Expand on sigma, group things that multiply the same pairs of operators

3.- Expand on k, use anticommutation to get the right order of the operators

(I know the spinors I'm using aren't quite the standard, but my advisor insisted I use those)

4.- Then I used some basic assumptions about square lattices and nearest neighbors to simplify a few terms and put them in the matrix

5.- Put the matrix in Wolfram|Alpha to get the eigenvalues

The problem is in the nested square root. We get a term like \Delta^2 sin^2(k_y) and there's nothing similar for k_x, but my advisor says that the eigenvalues MUST be symmetric on k because the matrix is

I mean, the matrix doesn't seem symmetric in k to me, since the imaginary term is always related to k_x and not k_y, but maybe that's wrong, I don't know

When my advisor pointed out other problems it wasn't always easy to fix, but it was relatively easy to see I had done something wrong. This time however I simply can't find any mistakes. I read what I did over and over, trying to find any mistakes, and sometimes I'll find a wrong sing or a missing index, and I fix it, but it never changes the final result

I'm all out of ideas, so I decided to ask here
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
Comparison: Your Result vs. The Correct Expression

The correct expression for the eigenvalues λ is:

λ = ± [ |l|² + Δ² + ε'² ± 2 √( ε'² |l|² + Δ² (|l|² - l_x²) ) ]^(1/2)

Your derived eigenvalues (Equation 19) were:

λ = ± [ 4α²(sin²k_x + sin²k_y) + Δ² + ε'² + (J S_z)²
± 2 ( ε'² (4α²(sin²k_x + sin²k_y) + (J S_z)²)
+ Δ² (4α² sin²k_y + (J S_z)²) )^(1/2) ]^(1/2)

The second part of the inner product is: Δ² ( 4α² sin²k_y + (J S_z)² ).

The term in bold is Δ² l_y². The correct term should be Δ² (l_y² + l_z²) or Δ² (|l|² - l_x²). Your advisor is correct that the absence of k_x dependence in that Δ² term is the symmetry-breaking error.
 
Thread 'Unexpected irregular reflection signal from a high-finesse cavity'
I am observing an irregular, aperiodic noise pattern in the reflection signal of a high-finesse optical cavity (finesse ≈ 20,000). The cavity is normally operated using a standard Pound–Drever–Hall (PDH) locking configuration, where an EOM provides phase modulation. The signals shown in the attached figures were recorded with the modulation turned off. Under these conditions, when scanning the laser frequency across a cavity resonance, I expected to observe a simple reflection dip. Instead...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K