 #1
 85
 2
Main Question or Discussion Point
I am trying to use the k.p method to study quantum well band structure. One example Hamiltonian look like this [J. Appl. Phys., 116, 033709(2014)]
where
##{{\hat k}_ \pm } = {{\hat k}_x} \pm i{{\hat k}_y}##
and the matrix elements are function of ##{{\hat k}_i}##
and if quantum well is grown along z direction
the envelop functions have the form
\[F(x,y,z) = {e^{i{{\bf{k}}_\parallel } \cdot {\bf{r}}}}f(z)\]
and therefore
##\left\{ \begin{array}{l}
{{\hat k}_x} =  i\frac{\partial }{{\partial x}} \to {k_x}\\
{{\hat k}_y} =  i\frac{\partial }{{\partial y}} \to {k_y}\\
{{\hat k}_z} =  i\frac{\partial }{{\partial z}}
\end{array} \right.##
this Hamiltonian is an hermitian operator, but I am confused about this. For example, if I look at the (1,4) and (4,1) terms and use ${{\hat k}_z}=i{\partial _z}$, the (1,4) term becomes
##i{\partial _z}{P_1}##
and the (4,1) term becomes
## i{P_1}{\partial _z}##
If I use finite difference method to turn these two terms into a matrix block, the factor i is not going to flip sign and the matrix cannot he a hermitian matrix?
there must be something wrong with my understanding, please help.
where
##{{\hat k}_ \pm } = {{\hat k}_x} \pm i{{\hat k}_y}##
and the matrix elements are function of ##{{\hat k}_i}##
and if quantum well is grown along z direction
the envelop functions have the form
\[F(x,y,z) = {e^{i{{\bf{k}}_\parallel } \cdot {\bf{r}}}}f(z)\]
and therefore
##\left\{ \begin{array}{l}
{{\hat k}_x} =  i\frac{\partial }{{\partial x}} \to {k_x}\\
{{\hat k}_y} =  i\frac{\partial }{{\partial y}} \to {k_y}\\
{{\hat k}_z} =  i\frac{\partial }{{\partial z}}
\end{array} \right.##
this Hamiltonian is an hermitian operator, but I am confused about this. For example, if I look at the (1,4) and (4,1) terms and use ${{\hat k}_z}=i{\partial _z}$, the (1,4) term becomes
##i{\partial _z}{P_1}##
and the (4,1) term becomes
## i{P_1}{\partial _z}##
If I use finite difference method to turn these two terms into a matrix block, the factor i is not going to flip sign and the matrix cannot he a hermitian matrix?
there must be something wrong with my understanding, please help.
Attachments

29.1 KB Views: 799